The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New Perspectives on Nanomaterial Aquatic Ecotoxicity: Production Impacts Exceed Direct Exposure Impacts for Carbon Nanotoubes
Abstract
Environmental impacts due to engineered nanomaterials arise both from releases of the nanomaterials themselves as well as from their synthesis. In this work, we employ the USEtox model to quantify and compare aquatic ecotoxicity impacts over the life cycle of carbon nanotubes (CNTs). USEtox is an integrated multimedia fate, transport, and toxicity model covering large classes of organic and inorganic substances. This work evaluates the impacts of non-CNT emissions from three methods of synthesis (arc ablation, CVD, and HiPco), and compares these to the modeled ecotoxicity of CNTs released to the environment. Parameters for evaluating CNT ecotoxicity are bounded by a highly conservative "worst case" scenario and a "realistic" scenario that draws from existing literature on CNT fate, transport, and ecotoxicity. The results indicate that the ecotoxicity impacts of nanomaterial production processes are roughly equivalent to the ecotoxicity of CNT releases under the unrealistic worst case scenario, while exceeding the results of the realistic scenario by 3 orders of magnitude. Ecotoxicity from production processes is dominated by emissions of metals from electricity generation. Uncertainty exists for both production and release stages, and is modeled using a combination of Monte Carlo simulation and scenario analysis. The results of this analysis underscore the contributions of existing work on CNT fate and transport, as well as the importance of life cycle considerations in allocating time and resources toward research on mitigating the impacts of novel materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Environmental applications of graphene-based nanomaterials
Perreault, F., Fonseca de Faria, A., & Elimelech, M. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00021a · Cited by 1,528
Self-citationQu, X., Brame, J., Li, Q., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300029v · Cited by 799
Xu, J., Cao, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, Z., Lou, Z., Xu, X., & Wang, X. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.061 · Cited by 786
Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters
Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B., & Johnson, J. X. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8 · Cited by 401
Mahlambi, M. M., Ngila, C. J., & Mamba, B. B. (2015) · Journal of Nanomaterials · doi:10.1155/2015/790173 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Eckelman, M. J., Mauter, M. S., Isaacs, J. A., & Elimelech, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-02-27
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2902-2910
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2033398175
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Perspectives on Nanomaterial Aquatic Ecotoxicity: Production Impacts Exceed Direct Exposure Impacts for Carbon Nanotoubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es203409a
- The paper
- Eckelman, M. J., Mauter, M. S., Isaacs, J. A., & Elimelech, M. (2012). New Perspectives on Nanomaterial Aquatic Ecotoxicity: Production Impacts Exceed Direct Exposure Impacts for Carbon Nanotoubes. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203409a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.