The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Scale and Technology Maturity in Life Cycle Assessment of Emerging Technologies: A Case Study on Carbon Nanotubes
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been applied for assessing emerging technologies, where large‐scale production data are generally lacking. This study introduces a standardized scheme for technology and manufacturing readiness levels to contextualize a technology's development stage. We applied the scheme to a carbon nanotube (CNT) LCA and found that, regardless of synthesis technique, CNT manufacturing will become less energy intensive with increased levels of readiness. We examined the influence of production volume on LCA results using primary data from a commercial CNT manufacturer with approximately 100 grams per day production volume and engineering design of a scaled‐up process with 1 tonne per day production capacity. The results show that scaling up could reduce 84% to 94% of its cradle‐to‐gate impacts, mainly as a result of the recycling of feedstock that becomes economically viable only beyond certain minimum production volume. This study shows that LCAs on emerging technologies based on immature data should be interpreted in conjunction with their technology and manufacturing readiness levels and reinforces the need of standardizing and communicating information on these readiness levels and scale of production in life cycle inventory practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
Self-citation
Cited by
van der Giesen, C., Cucurachi, S., Guinée, J., Kramer, G. J., & Tukker, A. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120904 · Cited by 386
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Guide to Best Practice
(2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527655625 · Cited by 299
Owsianiak, M., Ryberg, M. W., Renz, M., Hitzl, M., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2016) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01732 · Cited by 111
Yang, D., Li, L., Li, X., Xi, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Wei, X., Zhou, W., Wei, F., Xie, S., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38133-0 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Gavankar, S., Suh, S., & Keller, A. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 2014-09-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-60
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W1492447840
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Scale and Technology Maturity in Life Cycle Assessment of Emerging Technologies: A Case Study on Carbon Nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jiec.12175
- The paper
- Gavankar, S., Suh, S., & Keller, A. A. (2015). The Role of Scale and Technology Maturity in Life Cycle Assessment of Emerging Technologies: A Case Study on Carbon Nanotubes. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.