The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance
Abstract
In a naturalistic newspaper reading study, two pairs of information graphics have been designed to study the effects of (a) the spatial contiguity principle and (b) the dual scripting principle by means of eye tracking measurements. Our data clearly show that different spatial layouts have a significant effect on readers' eye movement behaviour. An integrated format with spatial contiguity between text and illustrations facilitates integration. Reading of information graphics is moreover significantly enhanced by a serial format, resulting from dual attentional guidance. The dual scripting principle is associated with a bottom‐up guidance through the spatial layout of the presentation, suggesting a specific reading path, and with a top‐down guidance through the conceptual pre‐processing of the contents, facilitating information processing and semantic integration of the material. The integrated and serial formats not only attract readers' initial attention but also sustain the readers' interest, thereby promoting a longer and deeper processing of the complex material. The results are an important contribution to the study of the cognitive processes involved in text‐picture integration and offer relevant insights about attentional guidance in printed media, computer‐based instructional materials and textbook design. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayer, R. E. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811678 · Cited by 7,800
Mayer, R. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781316941355 · Cited by 7,777
Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1022193728205 · Cited by 6,023
Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2 · Cited by 2,894
Mayer, R. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164603 · Cited by 2,304
Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.020 · Cited by 412
The Role of Visual Indicators in Dual Sensory Mode Instruction
Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/0144341970170307 · Cited by 295 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, attention allocation to relevant parts of a complex presentation can be directed by textual reference to the illustration, by a keyword or label, by graphical means such asarrows,pointers and speechbubbles,or colourcoding(De Koning,Tabbers, Rikers, & Paas, 2007; Folker, Sichelschmidt, & Ritter, 2005; Jeun…”
Cited by
Attention guidance during example study via the model’s eye movements
van Gog, T., Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Paas, F. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.007 · Cited by 224
Representation control increases task efficiency in complex graphical representations
Moritz, J., Meyerhoff, H. S., Meyer-Dernbecher, C., & Schwan, S. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196420 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K.
- Venue
- Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-23
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1215-1226
- ISSN
- 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0720
- OpenAlex
- W2112006058
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.