Cited by 295Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesLearning Styles and Cognitive DifferencesOnline and Blended Learning

The Role of Visual Indicators in Dual Sensory Mode Instruction

Jeung, Hyun‐Ju, Chandler, Paul, Sweller, John·1997·Educational Psychology

Abstract

Advances in our knowledge of the structure of working memory suggest that under some circumstances, effectively more processing capacity is available to learners if instructional materials use multiple information modes (e.g. auditory and visual) instead of equivalent single mode formats. This paper examined this modality effect from a cognitive load perspective in three experiments using geometry instruction. In accordance with cognitive load theory, it was predicted that the additional processing capacity provided in an audio/visual format would only enhance learning if mental resources were not devoted to extensive visual based search in order to coordinate auditory and visual information. Using two different areas of geometry, Experiments 1 and 2 found that if visual search was clearly high, then audio‐visual instruction was only beneficial if visual indicators in the form of electronic flashing were incorporated into the instructional format. Under high search conditions, a standard audio/visual format without the aid of flashing proved no better than visual only instruction. Experiment 3 attempted to clarify earlier results by using instructional materials trivially low in visual search. Data indicated that a standard, audio‐visual format resulted in superior learning to a visual only format. There was no beneficial effect of electronic flashing in Experiment 3, suggesting that visual indicators were not necessary in areas of low visual search. It was concluded that cognitive load as determined by visual search established the effectiveness of visual indicators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0144341970170307

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cueing can be even more effective when the amount of necessary visual search is high, such as in complex graphics.

    “Some studies report that visual cues do aid learning in multimedia instructions resulting in higher retention scores (e.g., Tabbers et al. 2004), whereas others show that cueing can be even more effective when the amount of necessary visual search, such as in complex graphics, is high (e.g., Jeung et al. 1997).”

    From Interactivity in Video-based Models (2007) · cites this paper as Jeung et al. 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Chandler, Paul
Venue
Educational Psychology
Published
1997-09
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
329-345
ISSN
  • 0144-3410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5820
OpenAlex
W2141959084
Cited by
295
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
visual indicators, audio-visual instruction, cognitive load theory, visual search, geometry teaching, instructional modality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review