Cited by 51Personal Information Management and User BehaviorVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesMemory Processes and Influences

Does Multitasking Impair Studying? Depends on Timing

Pashler, Harold, Kang, Sean H. K., Ip, Renita Y.·2013·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Summary: It is often said that contemporary students frequently study while ‘multitasking’. However, this rather diffuse term encompasses situations that vary as to the whether the learner controls the pace at which educational materials are provided. On the basis of prior cognitive research, we hypothesize that this may well be a critical determinant of interference. Three studies required students to read or listen to several short historical narratives and also to engage in five to eight very short conversations (akin to an instant messaging conversation). In Experiment 1, subjects read the narratives; here, multitasking marginally increased total time spent reading the narratives, especially when it occurred at random times. However, final memory for the narratives was not significantly affected. Similar results were obtained when the narratives were presented in audio format and the learner could pause them while conversing (Experiment 2). By contrast, when audio narratives did not pause, interruptions reduced comprehension performance (Experiment 3). Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.2919

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pashler, H., Kang, S. H. K., & Ip, R. Y.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Pashler, Harold
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-18
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
593-599
ISSN
  • 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0720
OpenAlex
W1869073875
Cited by
51
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
multitasking, reading comprehension, audio narratives, interference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review