Availability, Need for, and Use of Work Accommodations and Benefits: Are They Related to Employment Outcomes in People With Arthritis?
Abstract
Objective: To examine the availability, need, and use of workplace policies for workers with osteoarthritis (OA) and inflammatory arthritis (IA) and their association with employment outcomes. Methods: Participants (n = 219) were employed, ages ≥25 years, and diagnosed with OA or IA. They were recruited through community advertising and rheumatology clinics in 2 Canadian provinces. Respondents completed a 35–45‐minute telephone interview assessing demographics (age, sex), health (diagnosis, pain, activity limitations), work context (job control), employment outcomes (workplace activity limitations, absenteeism, productivity losses, reduced hours), benefits (extended health, short‐term leaves), and accommodations (flexible hours, modified schedules, special equipment/adaptations, work‐at‐home arrangements). Regression analyses examined differences in benefit/accommodation need and use. Results: Many participants reported that arthritis impacted their work. But with the exception of extended health benefits, ∼50–65% of participants reported not needing each individual benefit/accommodation, although only 7.3% of respondents reported needing no benefits or accommodations at all. Greater job control and education were associated with greater perceived need and use of benefits/accommodations. Need was also associated with greater activity limitations, and disclosure of arthritis was related to use of benefits/accommodations. Participants needing but not using workplace policies often had significantly poorer employment outcomes compared to those using benefits/accommodations. Conclusion: Findings are relevant to workers with arthritis and to employers. Results suggest that individuals with arthritis are unlikely to be a drain on workplace resources. Many individuals do not use benefits/accommodations until needed, and among those using them, there were generally positive relationships with diverse employment outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Applicants with disabilities may forego disclosure unless an accommodation is necessary, and may also forego disclosure even if it means withholding accommodation requests.
“Because of these concerns, applicants with disabilities may forego disclosure unless an accommodation is necessary, although they may also forego disclosure even if it means withholding accommodation requests”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Gignac, Cao, & McAlpine, 2015
One possible reason for lower relative performance of workers with disclosed disabilities is that appropriate accommodation has not been provided or implemented.
“One possible reason for lower relative performance is that appropriate accommodation has not been provided or implemented (Gignac et al., 2015).”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Gignac et al., 2015
Cites
Varekamp, I., Verbeek, J. H. A. M., & van Dijk, F. J. H. (2006) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-006-0112-9 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Varekamp, I., Verbeek, J. H., de Boer, A., & van Dijk, F. J. (2011) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.3149 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Working with Persistent Pain: An Exploration of Strategies Utilised to Stay Productive at Work
Oakman, J., Kinsman, N., & Briggs, A. M. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9626-5 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gignac, M. A. M., Cao, X., & McAlpine, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Toronto Western Research Institute Toronto Ontario Canada
- Institute for Work & Health (CA)
- Venue
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 855-864
- ISSN
- 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-464X
- 2151-4658
- OpenAlex
- W1868447790
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 10.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN-106589)
- Canadian Arthritis Network, a Networks of Centres of Excellence, Canada
- The Institute for Work and Health
- Province of Ontario
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, workplace accommodations, workplace benefits, employment effects, job control, absenteeism, productivity loss, activity limitation, disclosure of illness, flexible work arrangements
- MeSH terms
- Absenteeism, Adult, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Efficiency, Female, Health Policy, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Insurance Benefits, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Occupational Health, Workload, Workplace, Cost of Illness, Sick Leave, Needs Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review