Cited by 39Disability Education and EmploymentMedical Practices and RehabilitationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Working with Persistent Pain: An Exploration of Strategies Utilised to Stay Productive at Work

Oakman, Jodi, Kinsman, Natasha, Briggs, Andrew M.·2017·Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose Maintaining productive employment for people with persistent pain conditions is challenging. This study aims to explore supports-work and non-work- used by employees to assist them in maintaining productive employment. Methods An exploratory, mixed-methods study comprising a questionnaire battery followed by semi-structured interviews to collect in-depth qualitative data was undertaken. The questionnaires measured descriptive variables used to select participants for interviews based on maximum heterogeneity sampling. Thirty-five semi-structured interviews were undertaken (14 males; 21 females). The interview schedule covered: employment situation, workplace challenges, workplace supports, coping strategies, motivations, future employment options and any other resources utilised. Inductive content analysis was undertaken using a grounded theory approach to systematically explore the data. Results Three key themes were identified: barriers to working productively, enablers to working productively, disclosing my condition at work. A key determinant of maintaining productive employment was a supportive employer. In addition, flexibility in the work organisation was also pivotal in maintaining sustainable, productive employment. An important issue emerged with regard to disclosure of one's condition to an employer. For some, this was a significant barrier to employment. Conclusions To ensure sustainable employment is attainable for those with persistent pain conditions, a good match is required between an employee and their work. Workplace accommodations may assist with improving job fit but this requires disclosure of a condition to an employer. Weighing up the risks and benefits of disclosure is difficult, and may be assisted by knowledge of available supports to assist with maintaining ongoing employment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10926-016-9626-5

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oakman, J., Kinsman, N., & Briggs, A. M.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Oakman, Jodi
Venue
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published
2016-01-22
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
4-14
ISSN
  • 1053-0487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3688
OpenAlex
W2274267608
Cited by
39
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Arthritis and Osteoprosis Victoria
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic pain, labor productivity, employment retention, workplace accommodations, employer support, work flexibility, coping strategies, person-job fit, employment problems
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Employment, Supported, Qualitative Research, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review