Cited by 38Healthcare Systems and TechnologyElectronic Health Records SystemsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Efficiency Gains for Rheumatology Consultation Using a Novel Electronic Referral System in a Safety‐Net Health Setting

Open access
Scheibe, Meghan M., Imboden, John B., Schmajuk, Gabriela, Margaretten, Mary, Graf, Jonathan D., Chen, Alice H., Yelin, Edward H., Yazdany, Jinoos·2015·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: Health information technology (HIT) holds promise in increasing access to rheumatologists by improving the quality and efficiency of referrals, but few studies have examined its use for this purpose. We evaluated the use and impact of a novel electronic referral (eReferral) system in rheumatology in a safety‐net health system. Methods: We examined eReferrals over 4 years. Our primary outcome was use of preconsultation exchange, defined as back‐and‐forth communication between referring and specialty care providers, facilitating triage of referrals, requests for more information, or resolution of questions without a visit. We calculated the proportion of eReferrals that underwent preconsultation exchange, time to reviewer response, and number of visits scheduled. To increase generalizability, we selected a random sample of eReferrals to undergo additional blinded, adjudicated review to assess agreement on appropriateness for preconsultation exchange. Results: Between 2008 and 2012, 2,383 eReferrals were reviewed and 2,105 were eligible for analysis. One‐fourth of eReferrals were resolved without a clinic visit. The proportion of eReferrals undergoing preconsultation exchange increased over time (55% in 2008 versus 74% in 2011), and the volume of referrals also steadily increased over time. Reviewer response time averaged between 1 and 4 days. In the random sample of eReferrals that underwent adjudicated review, agreement between reviewers was high (κ = 0.72). Conclusion: HIT‐enabled preconsultation exchange was used for a majority of eReferrals and facilitated communication between referring clinicians and rheumatologists. This redesigned system of care allowed for triage of a high number of referrals, with many referrals determined to be appropriate for preconsultation exchange.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acr.22559

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheibe, M. M., Imboden, J. B., Schmajuk, G., Margaretten, M., Graf, J. D., Chen, A. H., Yelin, E. H., & Yazdany, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-26
Volume
67
Issue
8
Pages
1158-1163
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-464X
  • 2151-4658
OpenAlex
W1737639124
Cited by
38
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Rheumatology Research Foundation
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K23 AR060259, P60 AR053308)
  • Rosalind Russell Medical Research Center for Arthritis at the University of California, San Francisco
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
electronic referral system, rheumatology consultation, health information technology, safety-net health system, referral triage, referral appropriateness
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Medical Informatics, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Rheumatic Diseases, Rheumatology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review