The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Lithium‐Sulfur Battery with a High Areal Energy Density
Abstract
The battery community has recently witnessed a considerable progress in the cycle lives of lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries, mostly by developing the electrode structures that mitigate fatal dissolution of lithium polysulfides. Nonetheless, most of the previous successful demonstrations have been based on limited areal capacities. For realistic battery applications, however, the chronic issues from both the anode (lithium dendrite growth) and the cathode (lithium polysulfide dissolution) need to be readdressed under much higher loading of sulfur active material. To this end, the current study integrates the following three approaches in a systematic manner: 1) the sulfur electrode material with diminished lithium polysulfide dissolution by the covalently bonded sulfur‐carbon microstructure, 2) mussel‐inspired polydopamine coating onto the separator that suppresses lithium dendrite growth by wet‐adhesion between the separator and Li metal, and 3) addition of cesium ions (Cs+) to the electrolyte to repel incoming Li ions and thus prevent Li dendrite growth. This combined strategy resolves the long‐standing problems from both electrodes even under the very large sulfur‐carbon composite loading of 17 mg cm−2 in the sulfur electrode, enabling the highest areal capacity (9 mAh cm−2) to date while preserving stable cycling performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings
Lee, H., Dellatore, S. M., Miller, W. M., & Messersmith, P. B. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1147241 · Cited by 10,965
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Review on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Huang, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700260 · Cited by 1,746
Understanding the Anchoring Effect of Two-Dimensional Layered Materials for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Seh, Z. W., Fu, Z., Zhang, R., & Cui, Y. (2015) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00367 · Cited by 931
Tao, X., Wang, J., Ying, Z., Cai, Q., Zheng, G., Gan, Y., Huang, H., Xia, Y., Liang, C., Zhang, W., et al. (2014) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl502331f · Cited by 687
Huang, J.-Q., Zhang, Q., & Wei, F. (2015) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.008 · Cited by 665
Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
Chung, S., & Manthiram, A. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901125 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J., Hwang, T. H., Kim, B. G., Min, J., & Choi, J. W.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06-23
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 5359-5367
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W1984578572
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.