Cited by 479Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingGraphene research and applications

High Surface Area MoS 2 /Graphene Hybrid Aerogel for Ultrasensitive NO 2 Detection

Open access
Long, Hu, Harley‐Trochimczyk, Anna, Pham, Thang, Tang, Zirong, Shi, Tielin, Zettl, Alex, Carraro, Carlo, Worsley, Marcus A. +1 more·2016·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

A MoS 2 /graphene hybrid aerogel synthesized with two‐dimensional MoS 2 sheets coating a high surface area graphene aerogel scaffold is characterized and used for ultrasensitive NO 2 detection. The combination of graphene and MoS 2 leads to improved sensing properties with the graphene scaffold providing high specific surface area and high electrical and thermal conductivity and the single to few‐layer MoS 2 sheets providing high sensitivity and selectivity to NO 2 . The hybrid aerogel is integrated onto a low‐power microheater platform to probe the gas sensing performance. At room temperature, the sensor exhibits an ultralow detection limit of 50 ppb NO 2 . By heating the material to 200 °C, the response and recovery times to reach 90% of the final signal decrease to <1 min, while retaining the low detection limit. The MoS 2 /graphene hybrid also shows good selectivity for NO 2 against H 2 and CO, especially when compared to bare graphene aerogel. The unique structure of the hybrid aerogel is responsible for the ultrasensitive, selective, and fast NO 2 sensing. The improved sensing performance of this hybrid aerogel also suggests the possibility of other 2D material combinations for further sensing applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201601562

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When compared to graphene precursor aerogels, the hybrid graphene/MoS2 conductive aerogel had a higher surface area and 10 times lower HER current when tested for catalytic activity.

    “When compared to graphene precursor aerogels, the hybrid graphene/MoS2 conductive aerogel had a higher surface area and 10 times lower HER current when tested for catalytic activity.”

    From Three-Dimensional Printed MoS<sub>2</sub>/Graphene Aerogel Electrodes for Hydrogen Evolution Reactions (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Abstract reports a graphene aerogel surface area of 1200 m²/g, while Results and Discussion gives 700 m²/g for the MoS₂/graphene hybrid—the opposite of the claimed comparison. The paper discusses NO₂ sensing and mentions earlier work on hydrogen-evolution catalysis, but does not report a tenfold difference in HER current. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous works have shown a straightforward method for using the architecture of a precursor graphene aerogel to generate multilayer dichalcogenide aerogels.

    “Previous works have shown a straightforward method for using the architecture of a precursor graphene aerogel to generate multilayer dichalcogenide aerogels.15,16”

    From Three-Dimensional Printed MoS<sub>2</sub>/Graphene Aerogel Electrodes for Hydrogen Evolution Reactions (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Synthesis Methods and Results and Discussion describe using a precursor graphene aerogel as a scaffold to make a MoS₂/graphene hybrid aerogel. They do not establish the broader claim about multilayer dichalcogenide aerogels: the reported MoS₂ coating consists of one- to three-layer sheets, mainly monolayer, and the product retains the graphene scaffold. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Late D. J.; Huang, Y.-K.; Liu, B. Acharya, J. Shirodkar, S. N.; Luo, J.; Yan, A. Charles, D. Waghmare, U. V.; Dravid, V. P.; and Rao, C. N. R. Sensing Behavior of Atomically Thin-Layered MoS2 Transistors. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4879-4891.
  2. Perkins, F. K.; Friedman, A. L.; Cobas, E.; Campbell, P. M.; Jernigan, G. G.; Jonker, B. T. Chemical Vapor Sensing with Monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 668-673.
  3. Kong, J.; Franklin, N. R.; Zhou, C.; Chapline, M. G.; Peng, S.; Cho, K.; Dai, H.J. Nanotube Molecular Wires as Chemical Sensors. Science, 2000, 287, 622-625.
  4. Chan, K.; Tsai, C.; Hansen, H. A.; Nørskov, J. K. Molybdenum Sulfides and Selenides as Possible Electrocatalysts for CO2 Reduction. Chem-Cat. Chem, 2014, 6, 1899-1905.
  5. Yavari, F.; Chen, Z.; Thomas, A.V.; Ren, W.; Cheng, H.-M.; Koratkar, N. High Sensitivity Gas Detection Using a Macroscopic Three-Dimensional Graphene Foam Network. Sci. Rep., 2011, 1, 166.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Long, H., Harley‐Trochimczyk, A., Pham, T., Tang, Z., Shi, T., Zettl, A., Carraro, C., Worsley, M. A., & Maboudian, R.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology (CN)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Maboudian, Roya
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-23
Volume
26
Issue
28
Pages
5158-5165
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2406732376
Cited by
479
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 7
FWCI
21.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DEAC02-05CH11231, 1444950)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
  • British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
  • China Scholarship Council (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • Office of Science (DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02)
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02, DE-AC02-05CH11231., AC02–05CH11231)
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (AC02‐05CH11231, DE-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
Keywords
NO2 gas sensing, room-temperature gas sensors, two-dimensional materials, graphene aerogel, MoS2, detection limit, selectivity, response and recovery time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review