The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D Carbon Electrocatalysts In Situ Constructed by Defect‐Rich Nanosheets and Polyhedrons from NaCl‐Sealed Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks
Abstract
The proper structure design and defect engineering are of essential importance to develop advanced electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), which is a critical reaction in both fundamental science and industrial applications. Herein, a three‐dimensional carbon electrocatalyst is prepared by in‐situ linking carbon polyhedrons with nanosheets through high‐temperature pyrolysis of metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) confined in a salt‐sealed reactor. In the transformation to polyhedrons, the organic species partially decompose and form carbon nanosheets due to being confined in the salt reactor. The in ‐situ‐formed carbon nanosheets surround the carbon polyhedrons to form a 3D carbon network. Due to the confinement effect, the transformation of MOFs to carbon networks in the salt reactor is of high yield without significant loss of active carbon species, which would enhance the electron and mass transport for electrocatalysis. More interestingly, the as‐prepared 3D nanosheet‐linked‐polyhedron carbon (NLPC) is defect‐rich with high N‐doping levels and enriched active sites for electrocatalysis. With enhanced mass, electron transport, and enriched active sites, the material shows excellent activity as ORR electrocatalyst which is even comparable with Pt/C. The primary zinc‐air batteries assembled by the NLPC as the cathode also show outstanding performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future
Chu, S., & Majumdar, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11475 · Cited by 12,550
Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells
Debe, M. K. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11115 · Cited by 5,885
Zhong, H., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., Xing, W., Xu, D., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201408990 · Cited by 938
Shao, Y., Sui, J., Yin, G., & Gao, Y. (2008) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.047 · Cited by 763
Cited by
Defect Engineering on Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Batteries
Zhang, Y., Tao, L., Xie, C., Wang, D., Zou, Y., Chen, R., Wang, Y., Jia, C., & Wang, S. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201905923 · Cited by 1,019
Self-citationXie, X., Shang, L., Xiong, X., Shi, R., & Zhang, T. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102688 · Cited by 291
Chen, J., Liu, J., Xie, J.-Q., Ye, H., Fu, X.-Z., Sun, R., & Wong, C.-P. (2019) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.051 · Cited by 277
Wang, N., Bo, X., & Zhou, M. (2021) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.07.057 · Cited by 38
Han, Y., Yin, S., Chen, Y., Chen, C., Yan, W., Cheng, X., Li, Y., Zhang, T., Yang, J., Jiang, Y., et al. (2022) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116322 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Tao, L., Xiao, Z., Chen, R., Jiang, Z., & Wang, S.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-19
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2793253583
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D Carbon Electrocatalysts In Situ Constructed by Defect‐Rich Nanosheets and Polyhedrons from NaCl‐Sealed Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201705356
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Tao, L., Xiao, Z., Chen, R., Jiang, Z., & Wang, S. (2018). 3D Carbon Electrocatalysts In Situ Constructed by Defect‐Rich Nanosheets and Polyhedrons from NaCl‐Sealed Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201705356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.