The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Clear, Strong, and Thermally Insulated Transparent Wood for Energy Efficient Windows
Abstract
The energy used for regulating building temperatures accounts for 14% of the primary energy consumed in the U.S. One‐quarter of this energy is leaked through inefficient glass windows in cold weather. The development of transparent composites could potentially provide affordable window materials with enhanced energy efficiency. Transparent wood as a promising material has presented desirable performances in thermal and light management. In this work, the performance of transparent wood is optimized toward an energy efficient window material that possesses the following attributes: 1) high optical transmittance (≈91%), comparable to that of glass; 2) high clarity with low haze (≈15%); 3) high toughness (3.03 MJ m−3) that is 3 orders of magnitude higher than standard glass (0.003 MJ m−3); 4) low thermal conductivity (0.19 W m−1 K−1) that is more than 5 times lower than that of glass. Additionally, the transparent wood is a sustainable material, with low carbon emissions and scaling capabilities due to its compatibility with industry‐adopted rotary cutting methods. The scalable, high clarity, transparent wood demonstrated in current work can potentially be employed as energy efficient and sustainable windows for significant environmental and economic benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhao, D., Qian, X., Gu, X., Jajja, S. A., & Yang, R. (2016) · Journal of Electronic Packaging · doi:10.1115/1.4034605 · Cited by 559
Self-citation
Cited by
Advances in healthcare wearable devices
Iqbal, S. M. A., Mahgoub, I., Du, E., Leavitt, M. A., & Asghar, W. (2021) · npj Flexible Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41528-021-00107-x · Cited by 714
Recent advances in wet adhesives: Adhesion mechanism, design principle and applications
Cui, C., & Liu, W. (2021) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101388 · Cited by 557
Direct ink writing of energy materials
Tagliaferri, S., Panagiotopoulos, A., & Mattevi, C. (2021) · Materials Advances · doi:10.1039/d0ma00753f · Cited by 281
Mallakpour, S., Azadi, E., & Hussain, C. M. (2021) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2021.102436 · Cited by 178
4D printing: Perspectives for the production of sustainable plastics for agriculture
Maraveas, C., Bayer, I. S., & Bartzanas, T. (2022) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107785 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Mi, R., Li, T., Dalgo, D., Chen, C., Kuang, Y., He, S., Zhao, X., Xie, W., Gan, W., Zhu, J., Srebric, J., Yang, R., & Hu, L.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-11-18
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2989554001
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 75.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Clear, Strong, and Thermally Insulated Transparent Wood for Energy Efficient Windows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201907511
- The paper
- Mi, R., Li, T., Dalgo, D., Chen, C., Kuang, Y., He, S., Zhao, X., Xie, W., Gan, W., Zhu, J., Srebric, J., Yang, R., & Hu, L. (2020). A Clear, Strong, and Thermally Insulated Transparent Wood for Energy Efficient Windows. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201907511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.