The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Lithium‐Metal toward Anode‐Free Solid‐State Batteries: Current Developments, Issues, and Challenges
Open accessAbstract
The development of rechargeable batteries with high‐energy density is critical for future decarbonization of transportation. Anode‐free Li‐ion batteries, using a bare current collector at the anode side without any excess of Li, provide the highest volumetric energy density (>1500 Wh L−1) among all possible cell configurations. Furthermore, elimination of the anode material coating reduces material consumption and greatly simplifies cell production, which in turn lowers costs. Although significant progress has been made recently by the application of modified current collectors, optimized cycling parameters and improved liquid electrolytes, insufficient efficiencies, and dendritic growth during lithium plating lead to poor cycle life of typically less than 100 cycles as well as safety issues. Alternatively, very recent studies have demonstrated anode‐free solid‐state batteries that combine the benefits of high energy anode‐free cell configuration and solid‐state systems with high safety, exceeding 1000 cycles. This review provides an overview of recent developments toward anode‐free solid‐state batteries and highlights the current issues and challenges in this nascent field. It is concluded that, although major challenges remain at the present, the lessons learned in the fields of liquid electrolytes and solid‐state lithium metal batteries can accelerate the development of anode‐free solid‐state batteries of practical relevance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles
Nykvist, B., & Nilsson, M. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2564 · Cited by 1,819
Interface Stability in Solid-State Batteries
Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C., & Ceder, G. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 · Cited by 1,652
Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo–electron microscopy
Li, Y., Li, Y., Pei, A., Yan, K., Sun, Y., Wu, C.-L., Joubert, L.-M., Chin, R., Koh, A. L., Yu, Y., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam6014 · Cited by 1,547
Recycling End-of-Life Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries
Chen, M., Ma, X., Chen, B., Arsenault, R., Karlson, P., Simon, N., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.014 · Cited by 1,316
Nie, K., Hong, Y., Qiu, J., Li, Q., Yu, X., Li, H., & Chen, L. (2018) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00616 · Cited by 278
Cited by
2D MXenes for all-solid-state batteries: a comprehensive review
Narayanasamy, M., Zaman, S., & Koo, C. M. (2023) · Materials Today Energy · doi:10.1016/j.mtener.2023.101405 · Cited by 25
Artificial Intelligence in Electric Vehicle Battery Disassembly: A Systematic Review
Ai, Z., Nee, A. Y. C., & Ong, S. K. (2024) · Automation · doi:10.3390/automation5040028 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Heubner, C., Maletti, S., Auer, H., Hüttl, J., Voigt, K., Lohrberg, O., Nikolowski, K., Partsch, M., & Michaelis, A.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-09-13
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 51
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W3199122702
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Lithium‐Metal toward Anode‐Free Solid‐State Batteries: Current Developments, Issues, and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.202106608
- The paper
- Heubner, C., Maletti, S., Auer, H., Hüttl, J., Voigt, K., Lohrberg, O., Nikolowski, K., Partsch, M., & Michaelis, A. (2021). From Lithium‐Metal toward Anode‐Free Solid‐State Batteries: Current Developments, Issues, and Challenges. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106608
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.