The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the Site‐Selective Electrocatalytic Co‐Reduction Mechanism for Green Urea Synthesis Using Copper Phthalocyanine Nanotubes
Open accessAbstract
Green synthesis of urea under ambient conditions by electrochemical co‐reduction of N 2 and CO 2 gases using effective electrocatalyst essentially pushes the conventional two steps (N 2 + H 2 = NH 3 and NH 3 + CO 2 = CO(NH 2 ) 2 ) industrial process at high temperature and high pressure, to the brink. The single step electrochemical green urea synthesis process has hit a roadblock due to the lack of efficient and economically viable electrocatalyst with multiple active sites for dual reduction of N 2 and CO 2 gas molecules to urea. Herein, copper phthalocyanine nanotubes (CuPc NTs) having multiple active sites (such as metal center, Pyrrolic‐N3, Pyrrolic‐N2, and Pyridinic‐N1) as an efficient electrocatalyst which exhibits urea yield of 143.47 µg h –1 mg –1 cat and faradaic efficiency of 12.99% at –0.6 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode by co‐reduction of N 2 and CO 2 are reported. Theoretical calculation suggests that Pyridinic‐N1 and Cu centers are responsible to form CN bonds for urea by co‐reduction of N 2 to NN* and CO 2 to *CO, respectively. This study provides the new mechanistic insight about the successful electro‐reduction of dual gases (N 2 and CO 2 ) in a single molecule as well as rational design of efficient noble metal‐free electrocatalyst for the synthesis of green urea.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte
Nitopi, S., Bertheussen, E., Scott, S. B., Liu, X., Engstfeld, A. K., Horch, S., Seger, B., Stephens, I. E. L., Chan, K., Hahn, C., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 · Cited by 5,223
Cited by
Jiang, M., Wang, H., Zhu, M., Luo, X., He, Y., Wang, M., Wu, C., Zhang, L., Li, X., Liao, X., et al. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d3cs00857f · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Mukherjee, J., Paul, S., Adalder, A., Kapse, S., Thapa, R., Mandal, S., Ghorai, B., Sarkar, S., & Ghorai, U. K.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-05-16
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 31
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W4280649146
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the Site‐Selective Electrocatalytic Co‐Reduction Mechanism for Green Urea Synthesis Using Copper Phthalocyanine Nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.202200882
- The paper
- Mukherjee, J., Paul, S., Adalder, A., Kapse, S., Thapa, R., Mandal, S., Ghorai, B., Sarkar, S., & Ghorai, U. K. (2022). Understanding the Site‐Selective Electrocatalytic Co‐Reduction Mechanism for Green Urea Synthesis Using Copper Phthalocyanine Nanotubes. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202200882
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.