Cited by 188Surgical Sutures and AdhesivesHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsWound Healing and Treatments

Biomimetic natural biopolymer-based wet-tissue adhesive for tough adhesion, seamless sealed, emergency/nonpressing hemostasis, and promoted wound healing

Yang, Wen, Kang, Xinyi, Gao, Xu, Zhuang, Yan, Fan, Caixai, Shen, He, Chen, Yanyan, Dai, Jianwu·2023·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Bioadhesives have been used in clinics among the most prospective alternatives to sutures and staples for wound sealing and repairing; however, they generally have inadequate adhesion to wet surfaces, improper mechanical strength, poor hemostasis, and cytotoxicity. To address these challenges, a robust wet tissue adhesive based on collagen and starch materials (CoSt) is designed in this study. CoSt hydrogels integrate the feature of drainage, molecular penetration and strengthen cross‐linking similar to mussel, ivy, and oyster glues, which remove interfacial water quickly, reinforce tough dissipation and involve multiple reversible dynamic interactions. Therefore, they form strong adhesion and sutureless sealing of injured tissues, accompanying actuate robust biointerfaces in direct contact with tissue liquids or blood, resolving the crucial impediments with sutures and commercially accessible adhesives. The novel bioadhesive shows repeatable strong wet tissue adhesiveness (62 ± 4.8 KPa), high sealing performance (153.2 ± 35.1 mmHg), fast self‐healing ability, excellent injectability, and shape adaptability. For different hemostatic needs in rat models of tail amputation, skin incision, severe liver, abdominal aorta, and transected nerve injuries, the CoSt hydrogel shows better hemostatic efficiency than fibrin glue because of the coordinate efficacy of tough wound sealing property, outstanding red blood cell arresting capability, and the activation of hemostatic barrier memb…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.202211340

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional surgical suturing remains a dominant method for hemostasis but is often criticized for time-consuming operations and secondary tissue damage.

    “Nowadays, traditional surgical suturing remains a dominant method for hemostasis. However, it is often criticized for its time-consuming operations and secondary tissue damage [115].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, W., Kang, X., Gao, X., Zhuang, Y., Fan, C., Shen, H., Chen, Y., & Dai, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Yanyan
  • Dai, Jianwu
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-12-03
Volume
33
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W4311209623
Cited by
188
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 16
FWCI
36.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20190231)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
bioadhesive hydrogel, hemostasis, wound healing, sutureless wound closure, self-healing hydrogels, mussel-inspired adhesives, red blood cell adhesion, tissue repair, biocompatibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review