The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Universal Scaling Law to Predict the Efficiency of Magnetic Nanoparticles as MRI T2‐Contrast Agents
Open accessAbstract
Magnetic particles are very efficient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents. In recent years, chemists have unleashed their imagination to design multi‐functional nanoprobes for biomedical applications including MRI contrast enhancement. This study is focused on the direct relationship between the size and magnetization of the particles and their nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation properties, which condition their efficiency. Experimental relaxation results with maghemite particles exhibiting a wide range of sizes and magnetizations are compared to previously published data and to well‐established relaxation theories with a good agreement. This allows deriving the experimental master curve of the transverse relaxivity versus particle size and to predict the MRI contrast efficiency of any type of magnetic nanoparticles. This prediction only requires the knowledge of the size of the particles impermeable to water protons and the saturation magnetization of the corresponding volume. To predict the T2 relaxation efficiency of magnetic single crystals, the crystal size and magnetization – obtained through a single Langevin fit of a magnetization curve – is the only information needed. For contrast agents made of several magnetic cores assembled into various geometries (dilute fractal aggregates, dense spherical clusters, core–shell micelles, hollow vesicles…︁), one needs to know a third parameter, namely the intra‐aggregate volume fraction occupied by the magnetic materials relatively to the whole (hydrodynamic) sphere. Finally a calculation of the maximum achievable relaxation effect – and the size needed to reach this maximum – is performed for different cases: maghemite single crystals and dense clusters, core‐shell particles (oxide layer around a metallic core) and zinc‐manganese ferrite crystals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068445e · Cited by 6,852
Tromsdorf, U. I., Bruns, O. T., Salmen, S. C., Beisiegel, U., & Weller, H. (2009) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl902715v · Cited by 396
Cited by
Ulbrich, K., Holá, K., Šubr, V., Bakandritsos, A., Tuček, J., & Zbořil, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00589 · Cited by 1,730
Zhao, Z., Zhou, Z., Bao, J., Wang, Z., Hu, J., Chi, X., Ni, K., Wang, R., Chen, X., Chen, Z., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3266 · Cited by 477
Smolensky, E. D., Park, H.-Y. E., Zhou, Y., Rolla, G. A., Marjańska, M., Botta, M., & Pierre, V. C. (2013) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c3tb00369h · Cited by 156
Magnetic Nanostructures: Rational Design and Fabrication Strategies toward Diverse Applications
Wang, S., Xu, J., Li, W., Sun, S., Gao, S., & Hou, Y. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00370 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Vuong, Q. L., Berret, J., Fresnais, J., Gossuin, Y., & Sandre, O.
- Venue
- Advanced Healthcare Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-16
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 502-512
- ISSN
- 2192-2640 (ISSN-L)
- 2192-2659
- OpenAlex
- W1972466606
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Universal Scaling Law to Predict the Efficiency of Magnetic Nanoparticles as MRI T2‐Contrast Agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adhm.201200078
- The paper
- Vuong, Q. L., Berret, J., Fresnais, J., Gossuin, Y., & Sandre, O. (2012). A Universal Scaling Law to Predict the Efficiency of Magnetic Nanoparticles as MRI T2‐Contrast Agents. Advanced Healthcare Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.