Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Universal Scaling Law to Predict the Efficiency of Magnetic Nanoparticles as MRI T2‐Contrast Agents

Open access
Vuong, Quoc L., Berret, Jean‐François, Fresnais, Jérôme, Gossuin, Yves, Sandre, Olivier·2012·Advanced Healthcare Materials

Abstract

Magnetic particles are very efficient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents. In recent years, chemists have unleashed their imagination to design multi‐functional nanoprobes for biomedical applications including MRI contrast enhancement. This study is focused on the direct relationship between the size and magnetization of the particles and their nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation properties, which condition their efficiency. Experimental relaxation results with maghemite particles exhibiting a wide range of sizes and magnetizations are compared to previously published data and to well‐established relaxation theories with a good agreement. This allows deriving the experimental master curve of the transverse relaxivity versus particle size and to predict the MRI contrast efficiency of any type of magnetic nanoparticles. This prediction only requires the knowledge of the size of the particles impermeable to water protons and the saturation magnetization of the corresponding volume. To predict the T2 relaxation efficiency of magnetic single crystals, the crystal size and magnetization – obtained through a single Langevin fit of a magnetization curve – is the only information needed. For contrast agents made of several magnetic cores assembled into various geometries (dilute fractal aggregates, dense spherical clusters, core–shell micelles, hollow vesicles…︁), one needs to know a third parameter, namely the intra‐aggregate volume fraction occupied by the magnetic materials relatively to the whole (hydrodynamic) sphere. Finally a calculation of the maximum achievable relaxation effect – and the size needed to reach this maximum – is performed for different cases: maghemite single crystals and dense clusters, core‐shell particles (oxide layer around a metallic core) and zinc‐manganese ferrite crystals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adhm.201200078

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Vuong, Q. L., Berret, J., Fresnais, J., Gossuin, Y., & Sandre, O.
Venue
Advanced Healthcare Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-16
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
502-512
ISSN
  • 2192-2640 (ISSN-L)
  • 2192-2659
OpenAlex
W1972466606
Cited by
198
References
2
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Universal Scaling Law to Predict the Efficiency of Magnetic Nanoparticles as MRI T2‐Contrast Agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adhm.201200078
The paper
Vuong, Q. L., Berret, J., Fresnais, J., Gossuin, Y., & Sandre, O. (2012). A Universal Scaling Law to Predict the Efficiency of Magnetic Nanoparticles as MRI T2‐Contrast Agents. Advanced Healthcare Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200078

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.