Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 418

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sulfur Encapsulated in Graphitic Carbon Nanocages for High‐Rate and Long‐Cycle Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Zhang, Juan, Yang, Chun‐Peng, Yin, Ya‐Xia, Wan, Li‐Jun, Guo, Yu‐Guo·2016·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Hybrid sp2 carbon with a graphene backbone and graphitic carbon nanocages (G-GCNs) is demonstrated as an ideal host for sulfur in Li–S batteries, because it serves as highly efficient electrochemical nanoreactors as well as polysulfides reservoirs. The as-obtained S/(G-GCNs) with high S content exhibits superior high-rate capability (765 mA h g−1 at 5 C) and long-cycle life over 1000 cycles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201602913

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 418

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, J., Yang, C., Yin, Y., Wan, L., & Guo, Y.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-13
Volume
28
Issue
43
Pages
9539-9544
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2520979964
Cited by
418
References
2
FWCI
35.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfur Encapsulated in Graphitic Carbon Nanocages for High‐Rate and Long‐Cycle Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201602913
The paper
Zhang, J., Yang, C., Yin, Y., Wan, L., & Guo, Y. (2016). Sulfur Encapsulated in Graphitic Carbon Nanocages for High‐Rate and Long‐Cycle Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201602913

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.