The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More Reliable Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries: Status, Solutions and Prospects
Abstract
Lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries have attracted tremendous interest because of their high theoretical energy density and cost effectiveness. The target of Li‐S battery research is to produce batteries with a high useful energy density that at least outperforms state‐of‐the‐art lithium‐ion batteries. However, due to an intrinsic gap between fundamental research and practical applications, the outstanding electrochemical results obtained in most Li‐S battery studies indeed correspond to low useful energy densities and are not really suitable for practical requirements. The Li‐S battery is a complex device and its useful energy density is determined by a number of design parameters, most of which are often ignored, leading to the failure to meet commercial requirements. The purpose of this review is to discuss how to pave the way for reliable Li‐S batteries. First, the current research status of Li‐S batteries is briefly reviewed based on statistical information obtained from literature. This includes an analysis of how the various parameters influence the useful energy density and a summary of existing problems in the current Li‐S battery research. Possible solutions and some concerns regarding the construction of reliable Li‐S batteries are comprehensively discussed. Finally, insights are offered on the future directions and prospects in Li‐S battery field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode
Qian, J., Henderson, W. A., Xu, W., Bhattacharya, P., Engelhard, M., Borodin, O., & Zhang, J.-G. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7362 · Cited by 2,561
Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Bin Wu, H., Hao, C., Liu, S., Qiu, J., & Lou, X. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6002 · Cited by 1,059
Cited by
Pathways for practical high-energy long-cycling lithium metal batteries
Liu, J., Bao, Z., Cui, Y., Dufek, E. J., Goodenough, J. B., Khalifah, P., Li, Q., Liaw, B. Y., Liu, P., Manthiram, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0338-x · Cited by 3,412
Porous Polymers as Multifunctional Material Platforms toward Task‐Specific Applications
Wu, J., Xu, F., Li, S., Ma, P., Zhang, X., Liu, Q., Fu, R., & Wu, D. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201802922 · Cited by 555
Li, C., Li, Q., Kaneti, Y. V., Hou, D., Yamauchi, Y., & Mai, Y. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00021c · Cited by 513
Prussian Blue Analogs for Rechargeable Batteries
Wang, B., Han, Y., Wang, X., Bahlawane, N., Pan, H., Yan, M., & Jiang, Y. (2018) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2018.04.008 · Cited by 499
3D TiC/C Core/Shell Nanowire Skeleton for Dendrite‐Free and Long‐Life Lithium Metal Anode
Liu, S., Xia, X., Zhong, Y., Deng, S., Yao, Z., Zhang, L., Cheng, X., Wang, X., Zhang, Q., & Tu, J. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201702322 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, R., Zhao, S., Sun, Z., Wang, D., Cheng, H., & Li, F.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-04-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 48
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2604862259
- Cited by
- 1,785
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 86.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: More Reliable Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries: Status, Solutions and Prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201606823
- The paper
- Fang, R., Zhao, S., Sun, Z., Wang, D., Cheng, H., & Li, F. (2017). More Reliable Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries: Status, Solutions and Prospects. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606823
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
