The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomaterials and Advanced Technologies for Hemostatic Management of Bleeding
Open accessAbstract
Bleeding complications arising from trauma, surgery, and as congenital, disease‐associated, or drug‐induced blood disorders can cause significant morbidities and mortalities in civilian and military populations. Therefore, stoppage of bleeding (hemostasis) is of paramount clinical significance in prophylactic, surgical, and emergency scenarios. For externally accessible injuries, a variety of natural and synthetic biomaterials have undergone robust research, leading to hemostatic technologies including glues, bandages, tamponades, tourniquets, dressings, and procoagulant powders. In contrast, treatment of internal noncompressible hemorrhage still heavily depends on transfusion of whole blood or blood's hemostatic components (platelets, fibrinogen, and coagulation factors). Transfusion of platelets poses significant challenges of limited availability, high cost, contamination risks, short shelf‐life, low portability, performance variability, and immunological side effects, while use of fibrinogen or coagulation factors provides only partial mechanisms for hemostasis. With such considerations, significant interdisciplinary research endeavors have been focused on developing materials and technologies that can be manufactured conveniently, sterilized to minimize contamination and enhance shelf‐life, and administered intravenously to mimic, leverage, and amplify physiological hemostatic mechanisms. Here, a comprehensive review regarding the various topical, intracavitary, and intravenous hemostatic technologies in terms of materials, mechanisms, and state‐of‐art is provided, and challenges and opportunities to help advancement of the field are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RGD AND OTHER RECOGNITION SEQUENCES FOR INTEGRINS
Ruoslahti, E. (1996) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.697 · Cited by 3,191
Lusher, J. M., Arkin, S., Abildgaard, C. F., & Schwartz, R. S. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199302183280701 · Cited by 476
Cited by
Haemostatic materials for wound healing applications
Guo, B., Dong, R., Liang, Y., & Li, M. (2021) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-021-00323-z · Cited by 992
Nam, S., & Mooney, D. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00798 · Cited by 764
Polymeric hydrogel systems as emerging biomaterial platforms to enable hemostasis and wound healing
Pourshahrestani, S., Zeimaran, E., Kadri, N. A., Mutlu, N., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2020) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202000905 · Cited by 448
Ren, H., Zhang, Z., Cheng, X., Zou, Z., Chen, X., & He, C. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh4327 · Cited by 431
Microenvironment‐Based Diabetic Foot Ulcer Nanomedicine
Huang, F., Lu, X., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Li, Y., Kuai, L., Li, B., Dong, H., & Shi, J. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202203308 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Hickman, D. A., Pawlowski, C. L., Sekhon, U. D. S., Marks, J., & Gupta, A. S.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-22
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2770162756
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomaterials and Advanced Technologies for Hemostatic Management of Bleeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201700859
- The paper
- Hickman, D. A., Pawlowski, C. L., Sekhon, U. D. S., Marks, J., & Gupta, A. S. (2018). Biomaterials and Advanced Technologies for Hemostatic Management of Bleeding. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201700859
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.