The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acid and Base Resistant Zirconium Polyphenolate‐Metalloporphyrin Scaffolds for Efficient CO2 Photoreduction
Abstract
A series of zirconium polyphenolate‐decorated‐(metallo)porphyrin metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), ZrPP‐n (n = 1, 2), featuring infinite Zr IV‐oxo chains linked via polyphenolate groups on four peripheries of eclipse‐arranged porphyrin macrocycles, are successfully constructed through a top–down process from simulation to synthesis. These are the unusual examples of Zr‐MOFs (or MOFs in general) based on phenolic porphyrins, instead of commonly known carboxylate‐based types. Representative ZrPP‐1 not only exhibits strong acid resistance (pH = 1, HCl) but also remains intact even when immersed in saturated NaOH solution (≈20 m), an exceptionally large range of pH resistance among MOFs. The metallation at the porphyrin core gives rise to materials with enhanced sorption and catalytic properties. In particular, ZrPP‐1‐Co, with precise and uniform distribution of active centers, exhibits not only high CO 2 trapping capability (≈90 cm 3 g−1 at 1 atm, 273 K, among the highest in Zr‐MOFs) but also high photocatalytic activity for reduction of CO 2 into CO (≈14 mmol g−1 h−1) and high selectivity over CH 4 (>96.4%) without any cocatalyst under visible‐light irradiation (λ > 420 nm). Given the strong chemical resistance under extreme alkali conditions, these catalysts can be recycled without appreciable loss of activity. The possible mechanism for photocatalytic reduction of CO 2‐to‐CO over ZrPP‐1‐Co is also proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Xu, H.-Q., Hu, J., Wang, D., Li, Z., Zhang, Q., Luo, Y., Yu, S.-H., & Jiang, H.-L. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b08773 · Cited by 1,166
Sumida, K., Horike, S., Kaye, S. S., Herm, Z. R., Queen, W. L., Brown, C. M., Grandjean, F., Long, G. J., Dailly, A., & Long, J. R. (2010) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c0sc00179a · Cited by 347
Cited by
Atomic‐Level Reactive Sites for Semiconductor‐Based Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction
Zhang, Y., Xia, B., Ran, J., Davey, K., & Qiao, S. Z. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201903879 · Cited by 423
Self-citationWang, X.-K., Liu, J., Zhang, L., Dong, L.-Z., Li, S.-L., Kan, Y.-H., Li, D.-S., & Lan, Y.-Q. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b04887 · Cited by 384
Jing, J., Yang, J., Li, W., Wu, Z., & Zhu, Y. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202106807 · Cited by 367
Self-citationDislocated Bilayer MOF Enables High‐Selectivity Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 to CO
Liang, J., Yu, H., Shi, J., Li, B., Wu, L., & Wang, M. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202209814 · Cited by 270
Yan, Y., Li, C., Wu, Y., Gao, J., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d0ta03749d · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, E., Qiu, M., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., Liu, L., Sun, Y., Bu, X., Zhang, J., & Lin, Q.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-27
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2770249372
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acid and Base Resistant Zirconium Polyphenolate‐Metalloporphyrin Scaffolds for Efficient CO2 Photoreduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201704388
- The paper
- Chen, E., Qiu, M., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., Liu, L., Sun, Y., Bu, X., Zhang, J., & Lin, Q. (2018). Acid and Base Resistant Zirconium Polyphenolate‐Metalloporphyrin Scaffolds for Efficient CO2 Photoreduction. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704388
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.