Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioinspired, Spine‐Like, Flexible, Rechargeable Lithium‐Ion Batteries with High Energy Density

Qian, Guoyu, Zhu, Bin, Liao, Xiangbiao, Zhai, Haowei, Srinivasan, Arvind, Fritz, Nathan Joseph, Cheng, Qian, Ning, Mingqiang, Qie, Boyu, Li, Yi, Yuan, Songliu, Zhu, Jia, Chen, Xi, Yang, Yuan·2018·Advanced Materials

Abstract

The rapid development of flexible and wearable electronics proposes the persistent requirements of high‐performance flexible batteries. Much progress has been achieved recently, but how to obtain remarkable flexibility and high energy density simultaneously remains a great challenge. Here, a facile and scalable approach to fabricate spine‐like flexible lithium‐ion batteries is reported. A thick, rigid segment to store energy through winding the electrodes corresponds to the vertebra of animals, while a thin, unwound, and flexible part acts as marrow to interconnect all vertebra‐like stacks together, providing excellent flexibility for the whole battery. As the volume of the rigid electrode part is significantly larger than the flexible interconnection, the energy density of such a flexible battery can be over 85% of that in conventional packing. A nonoptimized flexible cell with an energy density of 242 Wh L−1 is demonstrated with packaging considered, which is 86.1% of a standard prismatic cell using the same components. The cell also successfully survives a harsh dynamic mechanical load test due to this rational bioinspired design. Mechanical simulation results uncover the underlying mechanism: the maximum strain in the reported design (≈0.08%) is markedly smaller than traditional stacked cells (≈1.1%). This new approach offers great promise for applications in flexible devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201704947

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Qian, G., Zhu, B., Liao, X., Zhai, H., Srinivasan, A., Fritz, N. J., Cheng, Q., Ning, M., Qie, B., Li, Y., Yuan, S., Zhu, J., Chen, X., & Yang, Y.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-31
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
e1704947-e1704947
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2790783579
Cited by
158
References
4
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioinspired, Spine‐Like, Flexible, Rechargeable Lithium‐Ion Batteries with High Energy Density. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201704947
The paper
Qian, G., Zhu, B., Liao, X., Zhai, H., Srinivasan, A., Fritz, N. J., Cheng, Q., Ning, M., Qie, B., Li, Y., Yuan, S., Zhu, J., Chen, X., & Yang, Y. (2018). Bioinspired, Spine‐Like, Flexible, Rechargeable Lithium‐Ion Batteries with High Energy Density. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704947

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.