The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
2D Polymers as Emerging Materials for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting
Abstract
Converting solar energy into storable and transportable chemical fuels using artificial photosynthetic systems can provide an alternative route to the current unsustainable use of fossil fuels, addressing the worldwide energy crisis and environmental issues. Recently, semiconducting polymers have emerged as a very promising class of photocatalysts for water splitting as their electronic and structural properties can be conveniently controlled and systematically designed at a molecular level. Among the various polymer photocatalysts that are reported so far, 2D polymer nanosheets are particularly interesting and gaining more attention. The 2D planar structure offers unique features such as high surface area, abundant surface active sites, efficient charge separation, and facile formation of heterostructures. The design and synthesis of 2D polymer nanosheets have greatly advanced the research in photocatalytic overall water splitting. Here, recent advances in developing photocatalysts based on 2D polymer nanosheets for photocatalytic overall water splitting are highlighted. Specifically, the existing approaches to tune their electronic structures and surface active sites for photocatalysis are discussed. Future opportunities and challenges for developing 2D polymers for photocatalytic overall water splitting are also included.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Walter, M. G., Warren, E. L., McKone, J. R., Boettcher, S. W., Mi, Q., Santori, E. A., & Lewis, N. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1002326 · Cited by 9,388
Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway
Liu, J., Liu, Y., Liu, N., Han, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, H., Lifshitz, Y., Lee, S.-T., Zhong, J., & Kang, Z. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa3145 · Cited by 4,468
Roles of Cocatalysts in Photocatalysis and Photoelectrocatalysis
Yang, J., Wang, D., Han, H., & Li, C. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300227e · Cited by 2,848
Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts
Xiang, Q., Yu, J., & Jaroniec, M. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15172j · Cited by 2,730
Photosynthetic energy conversion: natural and artificial
Barber, J. (2009) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b802262n · Cited by 1,843
Cited by
Recent developments in heterogeneous photocatalysts for solar-driven overall water splitting
Wang, Z., Li, C., & Domen, K. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00542g · Cited by 2,295
Conjugated polymers for visible-light-driven photocatalysis
Dai, C., & Liu, B. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee01935a · Cited by 687
Channel‐Rich RuCu Nanosheets for pH‐Universal Overall Water Splitting Electrocatalysis
Yao, Q., Huang, B., Zhang, N., Sun, M., Shao, Q., & Huang, X. (2019) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201908092 · Cited by 378
Wan, Y., Wang, L., Xu, H., Wu, X., & Yang, J. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c00564 · Cited by 363
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Chen, L., Xu, H., & Xiong, Y.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-07-22
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- e1801955-e1801955
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2883545071
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.