Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Worldwide Graphene Flake Production

Open access
Kauling, Alan P., Seefeldt, Andressa T., Pisoni, Diego P., Pradeep, Roshini C., Bentini, Ricardo, Oliveira, Ricardo V. B., Novoselov, Konstantin S., Castro Neto, Antonio H.·2018·Advanced Materials

Abstract

There are hundreds of companies worldwide claiming to produce “graphene,” showing a large variation in its properties. A systematic and reliable protocol is developed to test graphene quality using electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, elemental analysis, X‐ray photoelectron spectrometry, and scanning and transmission electron microscopy, which is used to study graphene from 60 producers. The statistical nature of the liquid‐phase exfoliation of graphite is established. It is shown that the current classification of graphene flakes used in the market is erroneous. A new classification is proposed in terms of distribution functions for number of layers and flake size. It is shown unequivocally that the quality of the graphene produced in the world today is rather poor, not optimal for most applications, and most companies are producing graphite microplatelets. This is possibly the main reason for the slow development of graphene applications, which usually require a customized solution in terms of graphene properties. It is argued that the creation of stringent standards for graphene characterization and production, taking into account both the physical properties, as well as the requirements from the particular application, is the only way forward to create a healthy and reliable worldwide graphene market.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201803784

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Kauling, A. P., Seefeldt, A. T., Pisoni, D. P., Pradeep, R. C., Bentini, R., Oliveira, R. V. B., Novoselov, K. S., & Castro Neto, A. H.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-13
Volume
30
Issue
44
Pages
e1803784-e1803784
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2890876314
Cited by
367
References
38
FWCI
15.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Worldwide Graphene Flake Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201803784
The paper
Kauling, A. P., Seefeldt, A. T., Pisoni, D. P., Pradeep, R. C., Bentini, R., Oliveira, R. V. B., Novoselov, K. S., & Castro Neto, A. H. (2018). The Worldwide Graphene Flake Production. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201803784

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.