Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defect‐Induced Pt–Co–Se Coordinated Sites with Highly Asymmetrical Electronic Distribution for Boosting Oxygen‐Involving Electrocatalysis

Zhuang, Linzhou, Jia, Yi, Liu, Hongli, Wang, Xin, Hocking, Rosalie K., Liu, Hongwei, Chen, Jun, Ge, Lei, Zhang, Longzhou, Li, Mengran, Dong, Chung‐Li, Huang, Yu‐Cheng, Shen, Shaohua, Yang, Dongjiang, Zhu, Zhonghua, Yao, Xiangdong·2019·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Rational design and synthesis of hetero‐coordinated moieties at the atomic scale can significantly raise the performance of the catalyst and obtain mechanistic insight into the oxygen‐involving electrocatalysis. Here, a facile plasma‐photochemical strategy is applied to construct atomically coordinated Pt–Co–Se moieties in defective CoSe 2 (CoSe 2−x) through filling the plasma‐created Se vacancies in CoSe 2−x with single Pt atomic species (CoSe 2−x‐Pt) under ultraviolet irradiation. The filling of single Pt can remarkably enhance the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity of CoSe 2. Optimal OER specific activity is achieved with a Pt content of 2.25 wt% in CoSe 2−x‐Pt, exceeding that of CoSe 2−x by a factor of 9. CoSe 2−x‐Pt shows much better OER performance than CoSe 2−x filled with single Ni and even Ru atomic species (CoSe 2−x‐Ni and CoSe 2−x‐Ru). Noticeably, it is general that Pt is not a good OER catalyst but Ru is; thus the design of active sites for electrocatalysis at an atomic level should follow a different intrinsic mechanism. Mechanism studies unravel that the single Pt can induce much higher electronic distribution asymmetry degree than both single Ni and Ru, and benefit the interaction between the Co sites and adsorbates (OH*, O*, and OOH*) during the OER process, leading to a better OER activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201805581

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Zhuang, L., Jia, Y., Liu, H., Wang, X., Hocking, R. K., Liu, H., Chen, J., Ge, L., Zhang, L., Li, M., Dong, C., Huang, Y., Shen, S., Yang, D., Zhu, Z., & Yao, X.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-28
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
e1805581-e1805581
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2903412046
Cited by
241
References
4
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defect‐Induced Pt–Co–Se Coordinated Sites with Highly Asymmetrical Electronic Distribution for Boosting Oxygen‐Involving Electrocatalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201805581
The paper
Zhuang, L., Jia, Y., Liu, H., Wang, X., Hocking, R. K., Liu, H., Chen, J., Ge, L., Zhang, L., Li, M., Dong, C., Huang, Y., Shen, S., Yang, D., Zhu, Z., & Yao, X. (2019). Defect‐Induced Pt–Co–Se Coordinated Sites with Highly Asymmetrical Electronic Distribution for Boosting Oxygen‐Involving Electrocatalysis. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805581

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.