The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anode Interface Engineering and Architecture Design for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are considered as one of the most promising options to realize rechargeable batteries with high energy capacity. Previously, research has mainly focused on solving the polysulfides' shuttle, cathode volume changes, and sulfur conductivity problems. However, the instability of anodes in Li–S batteries has become a bottleneck to achieving high performance. Herein, the main efforts to develop highly stable anodes for Li–S batteries, mainly including lithium metal anodes, carbon‐based anodes, and alloy‐based anodes, are considered. Based on these anodes, their interfacial engineering and structure design are identified as the two most important directions to achieve ideal anodes. Because of high reactivity and large volume change during cycling, Li anodes suffer from severe side reactions and structure collapse. The solid electrolyte interphase formed in situ by modified electrolytes and ex situ artificial coating layers can enhance the interfacial stability of anodes. Replacing common Li foil with rationally designed anodes not only suppresses the formation of dendritic Li but also delays the failure of Li anodes. Manipulating the anode interface engineering and rationally designing anode architecture represents an attractive path to develop high‐performance Li–S batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode
Qian, J., Henderson, W. A., Xu, W., Bhattacharya, P., Engelhard, M., Borodin, O., & Zhang, J.-G. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7362 · Cited by 2,561
Advanced Model for Solid Electrolyte Interphase Electrodes in Liquid and Polymer Electrolytes
Peled, E., Golodnitsky, D., & Ardel, G. (1997) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1837858 · Cited by 1,205
Cited by
Interface Engineering for Lithium Metal Anodes in Liquid Electrolyte
Zhai, P., Liu, L., Gu, X., Wang, T., & Gong, Y. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202001257 · Cited by 380
Interface engineering toward stable lithium–sulfur batteries
Guo, Y., Niu, Q., Pei, F., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Du, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Fan, L., et al. (2024) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee04183b · Cited by 322
Oloyede, M., Akpakwu, G., Myburgh, H., De Freitas, A., & Kunatsa, T. (2024) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj15090381 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Ye, Y., Wu, F., Li, Y., Li, L., & Chen, R.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-22
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e1806532-e1806532
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2914247429
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anode Interface Engineering and Architecture Design for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201806532
- The paper
- Zhao, Y., Ye, Y., Wu, F., Li, Y., Li, L., & Chen, R. (2019). Anode Interface Engineering and Architecture Design for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201806532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.