The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D Printed High‐Performance Lithium Metal Microbatteries Enabled by Nanocellulose
Abstract
Batteries constructed via 3D printing techniques have inherent advantages including opportunities for miniaturization, autonomous shaping, and controllable structural prototyping. However, 3D‐printed lithium metal batteries (LMBs) have not yet been reported due to the difficulties of printing lithium (Li) metal. Here, for the first time, high‐performance LMBs are fabricated through a 3D printing technique using cellulose nanofiber (CNF), which is one of the most earth‐abundant biopolymers. The unique shear thinning properties of CNF gel enables the printing of a LiFePO 4 electrode and stable scaffold for Li. The printability of the CNF gel is also investigated theoretically. Moreover, the porous structure of the CNF scaffold also helps to improve ion accessibility and decreases the local current density of Li anode. Thus, dendrite formation due to uneven Li plating/stripping is suppressed. A multiscale computational approach integrating first‐principle density function theory and a phase‐field model is performed and reveals that the porous structures have more uniform Li deposition. Consequently, a full cell built with a 3D‐printed Li anode and a LiFePO 4 cathode exhibits a high capacity of 80 mA h g−1 at a charge/discharge rate of 10 C with capacity retention of 85% even after 3000 cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers
Waheed, S., Cabot, J. M., Macdonald, N. P., Lewis, T., Guijt, R. M., Paull, B., & Breadmore, M. C. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc00284f · Cited by 1,039
Elastic modulus of single cellulose microfibrils from tunicate measured by atomic force microscopy
Iwamoto, S., Kai, W., Isogai, A., & Iwata, T. (2009) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm900520n · Cited by 754
Cited by
Lithium metal anodes: Present and future
Wang, R., Cui, W., Chu, F., & Wu, F. (2020) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2019.12.024 · Cited by 544
Printed aerogels: chemistry, processing, and applications
Feng, J., Su, B.-L., Xia, H., Zhao, S., Gao, C., Wang, L., Ogbeide, O., Feng, J., & Hasan, T. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00757a · Cited by 313
Additive Manufacturing of Batteries
Pang, Y., Cao, Y., Chu, Y., Liu, M., Snyder, K., MacKenzie, D., & Cao, C. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201906244 · Cited by 298
Basak, M., Arafat, K. M. Y., Lucia, L. A., & Pal, L. (2024) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05154 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, D., Xing, Y., Tantratian, K., Wang, X., Ma, Y., Mukhopadhyay, A., Cheng, Z., Zhang, Q., Jiao, Y., Chen, L., & Zhu, H.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-13
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- e1807313-e1807313
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2914174892
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D Printed High‐Performance Lithium Metal Microbatteries Enabled by Nanocellulose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201807313
- The paper
- Cao, D., Xing, Y., Tantratian, K., Wang, X., Ma, Y., Mukhopadhyay, A., Cheng, Z., Zhang, Q., Jiao, Y., Chen, L., & Zhu, H. (2019). 3D Printed High‐Performance Lithium Metal Microbatteries Enabled by Nanocellulose. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201807313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.