The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticle Characterization: What to Measure?
Open accessAbstract
What to measure? is a key question in nanoscience, and it is not straightforward to address as different physicochemical properties define a nanoparticle sample. Most prominent among these properties are size, shape, surface charge, and porosity. Today researchers have an unprecedented variety of measurement techniques at their disposal to assign precise numerical values to those parameters. However, methods based on different physical principles probe different aspects, not only of the particles themselves, but also of their preparation history and their environment at the time of measurement. Understanding these connections can be of great value for interpreting characterization results and ultimately controlling the nanoparticle structure–function relationship. Here, the current techniques that enable the precise measurement of these fundamental nanoparticle properties are presented and their practical advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Some recommendations of how the physicochemical parameters of nanoparticles should be investigated and how to fully characterize these properties in different environments according to the intended nanoparticle use are proposed. The intention is to improve comparability of nanoparticle properties and performance to ensure the successful transfer of scientific knowledge to industrial real‐world applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery
Blanco, E., Shen, H., & Ferrari, M. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3330 · Cited by 7,002
Progress and challenges towards targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics
Rosenblum, D., Joshi, N., Tao, W., Karp, J. M., & Peer, D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03705-y · Cited by 2,220
Filipe, V., Hawe, A., & Jiskoot, W. (2010) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0073-2 · Cited by 1,885
Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
Block copolymer micelles in nanomedicine applications
Cabral, H., Miyata, K., Osada, K., & Kataoka, K. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00199 · Cited by 1,309
Weighing of biomolecules, single cells and single nanoparticles in fluid
Burg, T. P., Godin, M., Knudsen, S. M., Shen, W., Carlson, G., Foster, J. S., Babcock, K., & Manalis, S. R. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05741 · Cited by 1,213
Self-citationComplement proteins bind to nanoparticle protein corona and undergo dynamic exchange in vivo
Chen, F., Wang, G., Griffin, J. I., Brenneman, B., Banda, N. K., Holers, V. M., Backos, D. S., Wu, L., Moghimi, S. M., & Simberg, D. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.269 · Cited by 599
Wuttke, S., Lismont, M., Escudero, A., Rungtaweevoranit, B., & Parak, W. J. (2017) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.025 · Cited by 286
Self-citationDirect Observation of Interactions between Nanoparticles and Nanoparticle Self-Assembly in Solution
Tan, S. F., Chee, S. W., Lin, G., & Mirsaidov, U. (2017) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00063 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Mendes, B. B., Conniot, J., Avital, A., Yao, D., Jiang, X., Zhou, X., Sharf-Pauker, N., Xiao, Y., Adir, O., Liang, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00104-y · Cited by 719
Metallodrugs in cancer nanomedicine
Peña, Q., Wang, A., Zaremba, O., Shi, Y., Scheeren, H. W., Metselaar, J. M., Kiessling, F., Pallares, R. M., Wuttke, S., & Lammers, T. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00468a · Cited by 259
Self-citationDeep learning for automated size and shape analysis of nanoparticles in scanning electron microscopy
Bals, J., & Epple, M. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ra07812k · Cited by 93
Parsaee, S., Jahani, N., Salehiniya, H., & Raeison, M. (2024) · Journal of Breast Diseases · doi:10.61186/ijbd.17.1.84
Metadata
- Authors
- Modena, M. M., Rühle, B., Burg, T. P., & Wuttke, S.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- e1901556-e1901556
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2946957142
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
