The DOI matches its Crossref record; 167 of the 167 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Programmable Logic in Metal–Organic Frameworks for Catalysis
Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as one of the most widely investigated materials in catalysis mainly due to their excellent component tunability, high surface area, adjustable pore size, and uniform active sites. However, the overwhelming number of MOF materials and complex structures has brought difficulties for researchers to select and construct suitable MOF‐based catalysts. Herein, a programmable design strategy is presented based on metal ions/clusters, organic ligands, modifiers, functional materials, and post‐treatment modules, which can be used to design the components, structures, and morphologies of MOF catalysts for different reactions. By establishing the corresponding relationship between these modules and functions, researchers can accurately and efficiently construct heterometallic MOFs, chiral MOFs, conductive MOFs, hierarchically porous MOFs, defective MOFs, MOF composites, and MOF‐derivative catalysts. Further, this programmable design approach can also be used to regulate the physical/chemical microenvironments of pristine MOFs, MOF composites, and MOF‐derivative materials for heterogeneous catalysis, electrocatalysis, and photocatalysis. Finally, the challenging issues and opportunities for the future research of MOF‐based catalysts are discussed. Overall, the modular design concept of this review can be applied as a potent tool for exploring the structure–activity relationships and accelerating the on‐demand design of multicomponent catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks
Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230444 · Cited by 16,945
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Heterogeneous single-atom catalysis
Wang, A., Li, J., & Zhang, T. (2018) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-018-0010-1 · Cited by 4,191
Luminescent metal–organic frameworks for chemical sensing and explosive detection
Hu, Z., Deibert, B. J., & Li, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00010b · Cited by 4,169
A homochiral metal–organic porous material for enantioselective separation and catalysis
Seo, J. S., Whang, D., Lee, H., Jun, S. I., Oh, J., Jeon, Y. J., & Kim, K. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35010088 · Cited by 3,924
Ultrathin metal–organic framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution
Zhao, S., Wang, Y., Dong, J., He, C.-T., Yin, H., An, P., Zhao, K., Zhang, X., Gao, C., Zhang, L., et al. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.184 · Cited by 2,602
State of the Art and Prospects in Metal–Organic Framework (MOF)-Based and MOF-Derived Nanocatalysis
Wang, Q., & Astruc, D. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00223 · Cited by 2,427
Fujita, M., Kwon, Y. J., Washizu, S., & Ogura, K. (1994) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00082a055 · Cited by 2,374
Metal–organic framework composites
Zhu, Q.-L., & Xu, Q. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60472a · Cited by 2,286
Single Cobalt Atoms with Precise N‐Coordination as Superior Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts
Yin, P., Yao, T., Wu, Y., Zheng, L., Lin, Y., Liu, W., Ju, H., Zhu, J., Hong, X., Deng, Z., et al. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201604802 · Cited by 2,251
Cited by
Opportunities and Challenges of Metal–Organic Framework Micro/Nano Reactors for Cascade Reactions
Wu, P., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Fan, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, W., & Huo, F. (2023) · JACS Au · doi:10.1021/jacsau.3c00344 · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, Y., Pan, T., Wang, L., Ren, Z., Zhang, W., & Huo, F.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-05-28
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- e2007442-e2007442
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W3165666724
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 167
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Programmable Logic in Metal–Organic Frameworks for Catalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.202007442
- The paper
- Shen, Y., Pan, T., Wang, L., Ren, Z., Zhang, W., & Huo, F. (2021). Programmable Logic in Metal–Organic Frameworks for Catalysis. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202007442
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.