Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,602

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrathin metal–organic framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution

Zhao, Shenlong, Wang, Yun, Dong, Juncai, He, Chun-Ting, Yin, Huajie, An, Pengfei, Zhao, Kun, Zhang, Xiaofei, Gao, Chao, Zhang, Lijuan, Lv, Jiawei, Wang, Jinxin, Zhang, Jianqi, Khattak, Abdul Muqsit, Khan, Niaz Ali, Wei, Zhixiang, Zhang, Jing, Liu, Shaoqin, Zhao, Huijun, Tang, Zhiyong·2016·Nature Energy
DOI 10.1038/nenergy.2016.184
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nenergy.2016.184

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Cook, T. R. et al. Solar energy supply and storage for the legacy and nonlegacy worlds. Chem. Rev. 110, 6474–6502 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Smith, R. D. L. et al. Photochemical route for accessing amorphous metal oxide materials for water oxidation catalysis. Science 340, 60–63 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Symes, M. D. & Cronin, L. Decoupling hydrogen and oxygen evolution during electrolytic water splitting using an electron-coupled-proton buffer. Nat. Chem. 14, 404–409 (2013).
  4. Ferreira, K. N., Iverson, T. M., Maghlaoui, K., Barber, J. & Iwata, S. Architecture of the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving center. Science 303, 1831–1838 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kanan, M. W. & Nocera, D. G. In situ formation of an oxygen-evolving catalyst in neutral water containing phosphate and Co2+. Science 321, 1072–1075 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Suntivich, J., May, K. J., Gasteiger, H. A., Goodenough, J. B. & Shao-Horn, Y. A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles. Science 334, 1383–1385 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Sheehan, S. W. et al. A molecular catalyst for water oxidation that binds to metal oxide surfaces. Nat. Commun. 6, 6469 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mills, A. Heterogeneous redox catalysts for oxygen and chlorine evolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 18, 285–316 (1989). · DOI
  9. Chen, G. X. et al. Interfacial effects in iron-nickel hydroxide-platinum nanoparticles enhance catalytic oxidation. Science 344, 495–499 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Furukawa, H. et al. Ultrahigh porosity in metal–organic frameworks. Science 329, 424–428 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Zhao, M. T. et al. Ultrathin 2D metal–organic framework nanosheets. Adv. Mater. 27, 7372–7378 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Qin, J. S. et al. Ultrastable polymolybdate-based metal–organic frameworks as highly active electrocatalysts for hydrogen generation from water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 7196–7177 (2015).
  13. Kornienko, N. et al. Metal–organic frameworks for electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 14129–14135 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kung, C.-W. et al. Metal–organic framework thin films as platforms for atomic layer deposition of cobalt ions to enable electrocatalytic water oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 28223–28230 (2015). · DOI
  15. Peng, Y. et al. Metal–organic framework nanosheets as building blocks for molecular sieving membranes. Science 346, 1356–1359 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Rodenas, T. et al. Metal–organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation. Nat. Mater. 14, 48–55 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Fang, Z. L., Bueken, B., Vos, D. E. D. & Fischer, R. A. Defect-engineered metal–organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 7234–7254 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lin, S. et al. Covalent organic frameworks comprising cobalt porphyrins for catalytic CO2 reduction in water. Science 349, 1208–1213 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Song, F. & Hu, X. L. Exfoliation of layered double hydroxides for enhanced oxygen evolution catalysis. Nat. Commun. 5, 4477 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Mesbah, A. et al. From hydrated Ni3(OH)2(C8H4O4)2(H2O)4 to anhydrous Ni2(OH)2(C8H4O4): impact of structural transformations on magnetic properties. Inorg. Chem. 53, 872–881 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Zhuang, Z. B., Sheng, W. C. & Yan, Y. S. Synthesis of monodispere Au@Co3O4 core-shell nanocrystals and their enhanced catalytic activity for oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Mater. 26, 3950–3955 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Ma, T. Y., Dai, S., Jaroniec, M. & Qiao, S. Z. Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheet–carbon nanotube three-dimensional porous composites as high-performance oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 7281–7285 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Miner, E. M. et al. Electrochemical oxygen reduction catalysed by Ni3(hexaiminotriphenylene)2 . Nat. Commun. 7, 10924 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Louie, M. W. & Bell, A. T. An investigation of thin-film Ni–Fe oxide catalysts for the electrochemical evolution of oxygen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12329–12337 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Yano, J. et al. X-ray damage to the Mn4Ca complex in single crystals of photosystem II: a case study for metalloprotein crystallography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 34, 12047–12052 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Sarangi, R., Cho, J., Nam, W. & Solomon, E. I. XAS and DFT investigation of mononuclear cobalt (III) peroxo complexes: electronic control of the geometric structure in CoO2 versus NiO2 systems. Inorg. Chem. 50, 614–620 (2011). · DOI
  27. Trześniewski, B. J. et al. In situ observervation of active oxygen species in Fe-containing Ni based oxygen evolution catalysts: the effect of pH on electrochemical activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 15112–15121 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gorlin, Y. et al. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy investigation of a bifunctional manganese oxide catalyst with high activity for electrochemical water oxidation and oxygen reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8525–8534 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Bajdich, M., García-Mota, M., Vojvodic, A., Nørskov, J. K. & Bell, A. T. Theoretical investigation of the activity of cobalt oxides for the electrochemical oxidation of water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 13521–13530 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Su, H. Y. et al. Identifying active surface phases for metal oxide electrocatalysts: a study of manganese oxide bi-functional catalysts for oxygen reduction and water oxidation catalysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 14010–14022 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Xiao, D. J. et al. Oxidation of ethane to ethanol by N2O in a metal–organic framework with coordinatively unsaturated iron (II) sites. Nat. Chem. 6, 590–595 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Fu, Q. et al. Interface-confined ferrous centers for catalytic oxidation. Science 328, 1141–1144 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Chen, J. Y. C. et al. Operando analysis of NiFe and Fe oxyhydroxide electrocatalysts for water oxidation: detection of Fe4+ by Mössbauer spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 15090–15093 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Yang, Y., Fei, H. L., Ruan, G. D., Xiang, C. S. & Tour, J. M. Efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution on amorphous nickel–cobalt binary oxide nanoporous layers. ACS Nano 8, 9518–9523 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lassalle-Kaiser, B. et al. Evidence from in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy for the involvement of terminal disulfide in the reduction of protons by an amorphous molybdenum sulfide electrocatalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 314–321 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Koningsberger, D. C. & Prins, R. X-ray Absorption: Principles, Applications, Techniques of EXAFS, SEXAFS, and XANES (eds Koningsberger, D. C. & Prins, R. ) Vol. 92 (Wiley, 1988).
  38. Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. Theoretical approaches to X-ray absorption fine structure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621–654 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Joly, Y. X-ray absorption near-edge structure calculations beyond the muffin-tin approximation. Phys. Rev. B 63, 125120–125130 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Bunău, O. & Joly, Y. Self-consistent aspects of X-ray absorption calculations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 345501–345510 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  42. Liao, P., Keith, J. A. & Carter, E. A. Water oxidation on pure and doped hematite (0001) surfaces: prediction of Co and Ni as effective dopants for photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 13296–13309 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Alidoust, N., Lessio, M. & Carter, E. A. Cobalt (II) oxide and nickel (II) oxide alloys as potential intermediate-band semiconductors: a theoretical study. J. Appl. Phys. 119, 025102 (2016). · DOI
  44. Gong, M. et al. An advanced Ni–Fe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst for water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8452–8455 (2013). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 2,602

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, S., Wang, Y., Dong, J., He, C.-T., Yin, H., An, P., Zhao, K., Zhang, X., Gao, C., Zhang, L., Lv, J., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Khattak, A. M., Khan, N. A., Wei, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, S., Zhao, H., & Tang, Z.
Venue
Nature Energy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-11-28
Volume
1
Issue
12
ISSN
2058-7546 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/nenergy.2016.184
OpenAlex
W2558998316
Cited by
2,602
References
4
FWCI
63.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrathin metal–organic framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nenergy.2016.184
The paper
Zhao, S., Wang, Y., Dong, J., He, C.-T., Yin, H., An, P., Zhao, K., Zhang, X., Gao, C., Zhang, L., Lv, J., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Khattak, A. M., Khan, N. A., Wei, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, S., Zhao, H., & Tang, Z. (2016). Ultrathin metal–organic framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nature Energy. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.184

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.