CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 184Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsGraphene research and applicationsElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

A 3D Chemically Modified Graphene Hydrogel for Fast, Highly Sensitive, and Selective Gas Sensor

Open access
Wu, Jin, Tao, Kai, Guo, Yuanyuan, Li, Zhong, Wang, Xiaotian, Luo, Zhongzhen, Feng, Shuanglong, Du, Chunlei +3 more·2017·Advanced Science
DOI 10.1002/advs.201600319PMC PMC5357982
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) has proved to be a promising candidate in high‐performance gas sensing in ambient conditions. However, trace detection of different kinds of gases with simultaneously high sensitivity and selectivity is challenging. Here, a chemiresistor‐type sensor based on 3D sulfonated RGO hydrogel (S‐RGOH) is reported, which can detect a variety of important gases with high sensitivity, boosted selectivity, fast response, and good reversibility. The NaHSO 3 functionalized RGOH displays remarkable 118.6 and 58.9 times higher responses to NO 2 and NH 3, respectively, compared with its unmodified RGOH counterpart. In addition, the S‐RGOH sensor is highly responsive to volatile organic compounds. More importantly, the characteristic patterns on the linearly fitted response–temperature curves are employed to distinguish various gases for the first time. The temperature of the sensor is elevated rapidly by an imbedded microheater with little power consumption. The 3D S‐RGOH is characterized and the sensing mechanisms are proposed. This work gains new insights into boosting the sensitivity of detecting various gases by combining chemical modification and 3D structural engineering of RGO, and improving the selectivity of gas sensing by employing temperature dependent response characteristics of RGO for different gases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/advs.201600319

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wu et al. [208] developed a hydrogel-based gas sensor with detection limits as low as 4.1 ppb NO2 and 1.48 ppm NH3.

    “Wu et al. [208] developed a hydrogel-based gas sensor with detection limit as low as 4.1 ppb NO2 and 1.48 ppm NH3, respectively.”

    From Functionalized Hydrogel-Based Wearable Gas and Humidity Sensors. (2023) · cites this paper as [208]

  • Compared with the unmodified device, the response of S-RGOH to NO2 and NH3 was improved by 118.6 and 58.9 times, respectively.

    “Compared with the unmodified device, the response of S-RGOH to NO2 and NH3 was improved by 118.6 and 58.9 times, respectively.”

    From Functionalized Hydrogel-Based Wearable Gas and Humidity Sensors. (2023) · cites this paper as [208]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. [1]L. T. Duy, D.‐J. Kim, T. Q. Trung, V. Q. Dang, B.‐Y. Kim, H. K. Moon, N.‐E. Lee, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 883.
  2. [2]H. Long, A. Harley‐Trochimczyk, T. Pham, Z. Tang, T. Shi, A. Zettl, C. Carraro, M. A. Worsley, R. Maboudian, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 5158.
  3. [3]a) C. Kuru, C. Choi, A. Kargar, D. Choi, Y. J. Kim, C. H. Liu, S. Yavuz, S. Jin, Adv. Sci. 2015, 2, 1500004; PMC5115349 27980930 b) X. Zhang, L. Yu, X. Wu, W. Hu, Adv. Sci. 2015, 2, 1500101; PMC5049619 27722075 c) M. W. G. Hoffmann, J. D. Prades, L. Mayrhofer, F. Hernandez‐Ramirez, T. T. Järvi, M. Moseler, A. Waag, H. Shen, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 595; d) J. M. Schnorr, D. van der Zwaag, J. J. Walish, Y. Weizmann, T. M. Swager, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 5285; e) J. Zhang, X. Liu, G. Neri, N. Pinna, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 795. 26662346
  4. [4]J. Wu, K. Tao, J. Miao, L. K. Norford, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 27502. 26630364
  5. [5]W. Yuan, L. Huang, Q. Zhou, G. Shi, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 17003. 25208097
  6. [6]J. Z. Ou, W. Y. Ge, B. Carey, T. Daeneke, A. Rotbart, W. Shan, Y. C. Wang, Z. Q. Fu, A. F. Chrimes, W. Wiodarski, S. P. Russo, Y. X. Li, K. Kalantar‐zadeh, ACS Nano 2015, 9, 10313. 26447741
  7. [7]J. Kong, N. R. Franklin, C. W. Zhou, M. G. Chapline, S. Peng, K. J. Cho, H. J. Dai, Science 2000, 287, 622. 10649989
  8. [8]N. A. Travlou, E. Rodríguez‐Castellón, T. J. Bandosz, Carbon 2016, 100, 64.
  9. [9]Y. H. Kim, S. J. Kim, Y.‐J. Kim, Y.‐S. Shim, S. Y. Kim, B. H. Hong, H. W. Jang, ACS Nano 2015, 9, 10453. 26321290
  10. [10]J. F. Liu, X. Wang, Q. Peng, Y. D. Li, Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 764.
  11. [11]W. Yuan, G. Shi, J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 10078.
  12. [12]F. Schedin, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, E. W. Hill, P. Blake, M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 652. 17660825
  13. [13]Y. P. Dan, Y. Lu, N. J. Kybert, Z. T. Luo, A. T. C. Johnson, Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1472. 19267449
  14. [14]J. T. Robinson, F. K. Perkins, E. S. Snow, Z. Q. Wei, P. E. Sheehan, Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3137. 18763832
  15. [15]F. Yavari, Z. Chen, A. V. Thomas, W. Ren, H. M. Cheng, N. Koratkar, Sci. Rep. 2011, 1, 166. 22355681 PMC3240974
  16. [16]a) Z. Ben Aziza, Q. Zhang, D. Baillargeat, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 254102; b) R. T. Lv, G. G. Chen, Q. Li, A. McCreary, A. Botello‐Mendez, S. V. Morozov, L. B. Liang, X. Declerck, N. Perea‐Lopez, D. A. Culleni, S. M. Feng, A. L. Elias, R. Cruz‐Silva, K. Fujisawa, M. Endo, F. Y. Kang, J. C. Charlier, V. Meunier, M. H. Pan, A. R. Harutyunyan, K. S. Novoselov, M. Terrones, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 14527. 26575621 PMC4664358
  17. [17]a) M. W. K. Nomani, R. Shishir, M. Qazi, D. Diwan, V. B. Shields, M. G. Spencer, G. S. Tompa, N. M. Sbrockey, G. Koley, Sens. Actuators, B 2010, 150, 301; b) R. Pearce, T. Iakimov, M. Andersson, L. Hultman, A. L. Spetz, R. Yakimova, Sens. Actuators, B 2011, 155, 451.
  18. [18]a) J. D. Fowler, M. J. Allen, V. C. Tung, Y. Yang, R. B. Kaner, B. H. Weiller, ACS Nano 2009, 3, 301; 19236064 b) S. Cui, H. Pu, E. C. Mattson, Z. Wen, J. Chang, Y. Hou, C. J. Hirschmugl, J. Chen, Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 7516; 24992696 c) Y. R. Choi, Y.‐G. Yoon, K. S. Choi, J. H. Kang, Y.‐S. Shim, Y. H. Kim, H. J. Chang, J.‐H. Lee, C. R. Park, S. Y. Kim, H. W. Jang, Carbon 2015, 91, 178; d) T. H. Han, Y. K. Huang, A. T. Tan, V. P. Dravid, J. Huang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15264. 21894991
  19. [19]W. Yuan, A. Liu, L. Huang, C. Li, G. Shi, Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 766. 23139053
  20. [20]V. Dua, S. P. Surwade, S. Ammu, S. R. Agnihotra, S. Jain, K. E. Roberts, S. Park, R. S. Ruoff, S. K. Manohar, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2154. 20187049
  21. [21]S. Liu, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Li, T. Zhang, Sens. Actuators, B 2016, 228, 134.
  22. [22]a) A. Lipatov, A. Varezhnikov, P. Wilson, V. Sysoev, A. Kolmakov, A. Sinitskii, Nanoscale 2013, 5, 5426; 23661278 b) G. Lu, L. E. Ocola, J. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 083111; c) G. Lu, L. E. Ocola, J. Chen, Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 445502. 19809107
  23. [23]D. C. Marcano, D. V. Kosynkin, J. M. Berlin, A. Sinitskii, Z. Z. Sun, A. Slesarev, L. B. Alemany, W. Lu, J. M. Tour, ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4806. 20731455
  24. [24]G. H. Lu, S. Park, K. H. Yu, R. S. Ruoff, L. E. Ocola, D. Rosenmann, J. H. Chen, ACS Nano 2011, 5, 1154. 21204575
  25. [25]J. Wu, K. Tao, J. Zhang, Y. Guo, J. Miao, L. K. Norford, J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 8130.
  26. [26]J. Dai, J. Yuan, P. Giannozzi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 232105.
  27. [27]L. Huang, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Pu, Y. Lin, S. Xu, L. Shen, Q. Chen, W. Shi, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 7426. 24806241
  28. [28]a) L. Li, S. He, M. Liu, C. Zhang, W. Chen, Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1638; 25556377 b) X. Liu, J. Cui, J. Sun, X. Zhang, RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 22601.
  29. [29]S. Jayanthi, A. Mukherjee, K. Chatterjee, A. K. Sood, A. Misra, Sens. Actuators, B 2016, 222, 21.
  30. [30]L. Jiang, Z. Fan, Nanoscale 2014, 6, 1922. 24301688
  31. [31]S. Some, Y. Xu, Y. Kim, Y. Yoon, H. Qin, A. Kulkarni, T. Kim, H. Lee, Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1868. 23736838 PMC3672880
  32. [32]S. Mao, G. Lu, J. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 5573.
  33. [33]W. Chen, L. Yan, Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3132. 21698339
  34. [34]Y. Xu, Z. Lin, X. Huang, Y. Wang, Y. Huang, X. Duan, Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 5779. 23900931
  35. [35]S. Cui, H. Pu, S. A. Wells, Z. Wen, S. Mao, J. Chang, M. C. Hersam, J. Chen, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8632. 26486604 PMC4639804
  36. [36]J. Hassinen, J. Kauppila, J. Leiro, A. Maattanen, P. Ihalainen, J. Peltonen, J. Lukkari, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 3611. 23462978
  37. [37]N. A. Travlou, M. Seredych, E. Rodríguez‐Castellón, T. J. Bandosz, Carbon 2016, 96, 1014.
  38. [38]ACGIH, In 2005 TLVs and BEIs Based on the Document of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents & Biological Exposure Indices; American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH): Cincinnati, Ohio, USA 2005, pp. 8– 29.
  39. [39]M. Seredych, T. J. Bandosz, J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 15596.
  40. [40]a) J. Liu, X. Wang, Q. Peng, Y. Li, Sens. Actuators, B 2006, 115, 481; b) X. Liu, Z. Chang, L. Luo, X. Lei, J. Liu, X. Sun, J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 7232.
  41. [41]L. Zhang, C. Li, A. Liu, G. Shi, J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 8438.
  42. [42]C. Y. Yan, J. X. Wang, P. S. Lee, ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2130. 25671368
  43. [43]W. Mickelson, A. Sussman, A. Zettl, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 173110.
  44. [44]Y. X. Xu, K. X. Sheng, C. Li, G. Q. Shi, ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4324. 20590149

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, J., Tao, K., Guo, Y., Li, Z., Wang, X., Luo, Z., Feng, S., Du, C., Chen, D., Miao, J., & Norford, L. K.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • School of Materials Science and Engineering Nanyang Technological University 50 Nanyang Avenue Singapore 639798 Singapore
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Feng, Shuanglong
  • Miao, Jianmin
ORCID
Venue
Advanced Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-12-20
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
1600319-1600319
ISSN
2198-3844 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1002/advs.201600319
PMC
PMC5357982
OpenAlex
W2563624639
Cited by
184
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Advanced Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61605207)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
sulfonated graphene, NO2 gas sensing, NH3 detection, volatile organic compounds, gas selectivity, temperature-dependent response, microheaters, chemically modified graphene, trace gas detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review