Cited by 225Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsConducting polymers and applications

Extremely Deformable, Transparent, and High-Performance Gas Sensor Based on Ionic Conductive Hydrogel

Wu, Jin, Wu, Zixuan, Han, Songjia, Yang, Bo-Ru, Gui, Xuchun, Tao, Kai, Liu, Chuan, Miao, Jianmin +1 more·2019·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Fabrication of stretchable chemical sensors becomes increasingly attractive for emerging wearable applications in environmental monitoring and health care. Here, for the first time, chemically derived ionic conductive polyacrylamide/carrageenan double-network (DN) hydrogels are exploited to fabricate ultrastretchable and transparent NO 2 and NH 3 sensors with high sensitivity (78.5 ppm –1 ) and low theoretical limit of detection (1.2 ppb) in NO 2 detection. The hydrogels can withstand various rigorous mechanical deformations, including up to 1200% strain, large-range flexion, and twist. The drastic mechanical deformations do not degrade the gas-sensing performance. A facile solvent replacement strategy is devised to partially replace water with glycerol (Gly) molecules in the solvent of hydrogel, generating the water–Gly binary hydrogel with 1.68 times boosted sensitivity to NO 2 and significantly enhanced stability. The DN-Gly NO 2 sensor can maintain its sensitivity for as long as 9 months. The high sensitivity is attributed to the abundant oxygenated functional groups in the well-designed polymer chains and solvent. A gas-blocking mechanism is proposed to understand the positive resistance shift of the gas sensors. This work sheds light on utilizing ionic conductive hydrogels as novel channel materials to design highly deformable and sensitive gas sensors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.8b17437

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DN hydrogel (PAM/Carr) has an elastic modulus of 299 kPa, four times higher than that of a single-network Carr hydrogel and 33 times higher than that of a single-network PAM hydrogel.

    “The DN hydrogel has an elastic modulus of 299 kPa, which is four times higher than that of a single-network Carr hydrogel and 33 times higher than that of a single-network PAM hydrogel”
  • Wu and his team [126] introduced Gly into chemically derived ion-conductive PAM/CArr DN hydrogels to prepare a high-performance stretchable room-temperature NH3 and NO2 sensor.

    “Further, in order to make the hydrogel have stronger mechanical deformability as well as better water storage capacity for complex practical application environments, Wu and his team [126] introduced the Gly into chemically derived ion-conductive PAM/CArr DN hydrogels to prepare a high-performance stretchable room-temperature NH3 and NO2 sensor.”
  • The sensor can withstand various stringent mechanical deformations, including up to 1.200% strain, wide ranges of bending and torsion, and has high sensitivity (78.5 ppm−1 to NO2 and 1.3 ppm−1 to NH3) and low LOD (1.2 ppb for NO2 and 220 ppb for NH3).

    “It can not only withstand various stringent mechanical deformations, including up to 1.200% strain, wide ranges of bending and torsion, but also has high sensitivity (78.5 ppm−1 to NO2 and 1.3 ppm−1 to NH3) and low LOD (1.2 ppb for NO2 and 220 ppb for NH3).”
  • The gas-sensitive performance of the sensor will not be impaired by strong mechanical deformation.

    “And the gas-sensitive performance of the sensor will not be impaired by the strong mechanical deformation, which means that the sensor will not fail to work properly in practical wearable applications due to human movement or other possible stretching scenarios.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, J., Wu, Z., Han, S., Yang, B.-R., Gui, X., Tao, K., Liu, C., Miao, J., & Norford, L. K.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Jin
  • Tao, Kai
  • Liu, Chuan
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2018-12-31
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
2364-2373
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2906825142
Cited by
225
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 23
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61801525)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030313400)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
Keywords
ionic conductive hydrogel, double-network hydrogel, NO2 gas sensing, NH3 detection, glycerol replacement, wearable sensors, sensor stability, solvent replacement
MeSH terms
Ammonia, Electric Conductivity, Nitrogen Dioxide, Hydrogels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review