The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metallic Nanoparticle Inks for 3D Printing of Electronics
Abstract
The three‐dimensional (3D) printed electronics additive manufacturing industry sector has grown substantially in the past few years, and there is increasing demand for different types of metallic nanoparticle inks in electronics printing for various applications. Metallic nanoparticle inks are commonly used for fabricating conductive tracks and patterns due to their relatively high electrical conductivity as compared to other types of inks, and they can be further categorized into single‐element metallic nanoparticle inks, alloy metallic nanoparticle inks, metallic oxide nanoparticle inks, and core–shell bimetallic nanoparticle (BNP) inks. It is critical to gain a deep understanding of the metallic nanoparticle inks used in 3D printed electronics as the material properties of these inks can directly affect the final electrical and mechanical properties of the printed patterns. This review presents an overview of the available metallic nanoparticle inks used for 3D printing of electronics, and critically reviews the strengths and weaknesses of each type of ink. Finally, the challenges of metallic nanoparticle inks in 3D printed electronics are also discussed along with the future outlook for 3D printed electronics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Ghosh Chaudhuri, R., & Paria, S. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100449n · Cited by 3,614
Size effect on the melting temperature of gold particles
Buffat, P., & Borel, J.-P. (1976) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.13.2287 · Cited by 3,362
Nanoparticles in Photodynamic Therapy
Lucky, S. S., Soo, K. C., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5004198 · Cited by 2,980
Size matters: why nanomaterials are different
Roduner, E. (2006) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b502142c · Cited by 2,317
X. The Bakerian Lecture. —Experimental relations of gold (and other metals) to light
Faraday, M. (1857) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1857.0011 · Cited by 2,123
A wearable and highly sensitive pressure sensor with ultrathin gold nanowires
Gong, S., Schwalb, W., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Tang, Y., Si, J., Shirinzadeh, B., & Cheng, W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4132 · Cited by 2,064
Surface plasmon resonance in gold nanoparticles: a review
Amendola, V., Pilot, R., Frasconi, M., Maragò, O. M., & Iatì, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa60f3 · Cited by 1,905
Au nanoparticles target cancer
Jain, P. K., El-Sayed, I. H., & El-Sayed, M. A. (2007) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/s1748-0132(07)70016-6 · Cited by 1,157
Conductive Nanomaterials for Printed Electronics
Kamyshny, A., & Magdassi, S. (2014) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201303000 · Cited by 911
Research works printed but not linked: 92
- 10.1039/C6NR09610G · doi:10.1039/c6nr09610g
- Tan H. W., 2016, 2nd Int. Conf. on Progress in Additive Manufacturing
- Tan H. W., 2016, IJIE 2016: The 18th Int. Conf. on Industrial Engineering
- 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.04.025 · doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2010.04.025
- 10.1109/JDT.2010.2065214 · doi:10.1109/jdt.2010.2065214
- Kawahara Y., 2013, 2013 ACM Int. Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
- Bonadiman R., 2010, Electronic System‐Integration Technology Conference (ESTC)
- 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.04.188 · doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2011.04.188
- 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.07.058 · doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2015.07.058
- Tan H. W., 2018, 3rd Int. Conf. on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro‐AM 2018)
- 10.1557/jmr.2012.419 · doi:10.1557/jmr.2012.419
- 10.1016/0040-6090(86)90422-0 · doi:10.1016/0040-6090(86)90422-0
- 10.1002/adma.201104417 · doi:10.1002/adma.201104417
- Rajan K., 2016, Nanotechnol., Sci. Appl., 9, 1
- Reder J., 2012, Inkjet Technology for Digital Fabrication
- 10.1038/srep21398 · doi:10.1038/srep21398
- 10.1021/acsami.5b12516 · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b12516
- 10.1007/s10404-014-1496-6 · doi:10.1007/s10404-014-1496-6
- 10.1080/00405000701547748 · doi:10.1080/00405000701547748
- 10.1016/j.cep.2012.07.007 · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2012.07.007
- 10.1039/c2jm35586h · doi:10.1039/c2jm35586h
- 10.1038/srep34470 · doi:10.1038/srep34470
- 10.1364/OE.19.021563 · doi:10.1364/oe.19.021563
- 10.1007/s11051-011-0306-2 · doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0306-2
- 10.1021/am400606y · doi:10.1021/am400606y
- 10.1016/j.mee.2015.10.006 · doi:10.1016/j.mee.2015.10.006
- 10.1016/j.sna.2017.07.025 · doi:10.1016/j.sna.2017.07.025
- 10.1080/17452759.2016.1229802 · doi:10.1080/17452759.2016.1229802
- 10.1021/acsami.6b14787 · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b14787
- 10.1109/TCAPT.2008.2010505 · doi:10.1109/tcapt.2008.2010505
- 10.1088/0960-1317/21/12/125023 · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/21/12/125023
- 10.1088/0957-4484/22/39/395705 · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/22/39/395705
- 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.07.045 · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2015.07.045
- 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.03.034 · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.03.034
- 10.1007/s11664-010-1384-0 · doi:10.1007/s11664-010-1384-0
- 10.1021/am404226e · doi:10.1021/am404226e
- 10.1007/s11664-011-1711-0 · doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1711-0
- 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.09.035 · doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2014.09.035
- 10.1088/0957-4484/22/39/395705 · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/22/39/395705
- 10.1021/la802182y · doi:10.1021/la802182y
- 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.02.045 · doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.02.045
- 10.1088/0957-4484/23/48/485205 · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/23/48/485205
- Sipilä E., 2015, 9th European Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP)
- 10.1088/1361-6528/aa6cda · doi:10.1088/1361-6528/aa6cda
- 10.1088/0957-4484/27/3/035203 · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/27/3/035203
- Kela L., 2014, Int. Congress of Metallurgy and Materials
- 10.1049/el.2014.2194 · doi:10.1049/el.2014.2194
- Raghavendra R., 2014, Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci., 2, 4
- Bachmann B., 2017, TechConnect Briefs, 4, 141
- 10.1016/j.mee.2008.12.058 · doi:10.1016/j.mee.2008.12.058
- 10.1166/jnn.2014.7208 · doi:10.1166/jnn.2014.7208
- 10.1002/adma.200400690 · doi:10.1002/adma.200400690
- 10.1021/ac3003243 · doi:10.1021/ac3003243
- 10.1039/C6SC00142D · doi:10.1039/c6sc00142d
- 10.1021/am303268k · doi:10.1021/am303268k
- 10.1109/JEDS.2017.2764498 · doi:10.1109/jeds.2017.2764498
- Platt H. A. S., 2012, 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf.
- 10.1007/s11664-015-4072-2 · doi:10.1007/s11664-015-4072-2
- 10.1049/iet-map.2012.0554 · doi:10.1049/iet-map.2012.0554
- 10.1007/s10853-005-3659-z · doi:10.1007/s10853-005-3659-z
- 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.075 · doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.075
- Segal‐Scharia M., 2019, Nano Dimension Announces New Collaboration with Tel Aviv University Enabling 3D Printing of Sensors Using Nickel Nano‐Particles
- Pasquarelli R., 2008, J. Undergrad. Chem. Res., 8, 91
- Liu P., 2015, US Patent US8940197B2
- 10.1002/adfm.201600657 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201600657
- 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.10.024 · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2015.10.024
- 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.08.018 · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2017.08.018
- Vasiliev A. A., 2018, Eurosensors 2018 Conf.
- 10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.3.831 · doi:10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.3.831
- 10.1088/0957-4484/22/22/225701 · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/22/22/225701
- Klassert A., 2007, Corrosion Behaviour and Protection of Copper and Aluminium Alloys in Seawater
- 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.05.014 · doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2014.05.014
- 10.1021/acsami.8b00551 · doi:10.1021/acsami.8b00551
- 10.1021/jp3005647 · doi:10.1021/jp3005647
- 10.2320/matertrans.MAW201017 · doi:10.2320/matertrans.maw201017
- 10.1080/15421401003609848 · doi:10.1080/15421401003609848
- 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.07.046 · doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2011.07.046
- 10.1088/2058-8585/aaa166 · doi:10.1088/2058-8585/aaa166
- 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.032 · doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.032
- 10.1007/s11051-012-0782-z · doi:10.1007/s11051-012-0782-z
- Ouyang Q., 2016, Semiconductor Technology Int. Conf. (CSTIC)
- Sharma G., 2017, J. King Saud Univ. Sci.
- 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.08.026 · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.08.026
- 10.1039/b821327e · doi:10.1039/b821327e
- 10.12974/2311-8792.2017.05.1 · doi:10.12974/2311-8792.2017.05.1
- 10.1021/acsami.7b14572 · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b14572
- 10.1038/s41598-018-28684-4 · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28684-4
- Weibing G., 2016, 6th Electronic System‐Integration Technology Conf. (ESTC)
- 10.1063/1.4939095 · doi:10.1063/1.4939095
- 10.1557/jmr.2013.73 · doi:10.1557/jmr.2013.73
- Alastalo A. T., 2011, MRS Proc., 1113, 2
- 10.1021/la0509044 · doi:10.1021/la0509044
Cited by
A review on inkjet printing of nanoparticle inks for flexible electronics
Nayak, L., Mohanty, S., Nayak, S. K., & Ramadoss, A. (2019) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c9tc01630a · Cited by 497
Recent Advances on High‐Entropy Alloys for 3D Printing
Han, C., Fang, Q., Shi, Y., Tor, S. B., Chua, C. K., & Zhou, K. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201903855 · Cited by 486
Self-citationFlexible Electronics: Status, Challenges and Opportunities
Corzo, D., Tostado-Blázquez, G., & Baran, D. (2020) · Frontiers in Electronics · doi:10.3389/felec.2020.594003 · Cited by 391
Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Structured Materials for Adsorption and Catalysis Applications.
Lawson, S., Li, X., Thakkar, H., Rownaghi, A. A., & Rezaei, F. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00060 · Cited by 341
Subhan, A., Mourad, A.-H. I., & Al-Douri, Y. (2022) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano12132144 · Cited by 95
“(2019) [55] FeO2, Ag, CdS, GaN, Si, TiO2, Al Electronic industry Used in solar cell development, semiconductor devices, ink for 3D printing in electronics”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, H. W., An, J., Chua, C. K., & Tran, T.
- Venue
- Advanced Electronic Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-28
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2199-160X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2929613351
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 10.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- National Research Foundation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metallic Nanoparticle Inks for 3D Printing of Electronics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aelm.201800831
- The paper
- Tan, H. W., An, J., Chua, C. K., & Tran, T. (2019). Metallic Nanoparticle Inks for 3D Printing of Electronics. Advanced Electronic Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.201800831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
