The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Polyaniline‐Coated Sulfur/Carbon Composite with an Enhanced High‐Rate Capability as a Cathode Material for Lithium/Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
Polyaniline‐coated sulfur/conductive‐carbon‐black (PANI@S/C) composites with different contents of sulfur are prepared via two facile processes including ball‐milling and thermal treatment of the conductive carbon black and sublimed sulfur, followed by an in situ chemical oxidative polymerization of the aniline monomer in the presence of the S/C composite and ammonium persulfate. The microstructure and electrochemical performance of the as‐prepared composites are investigated systematically. It is demonstrated that the polyaniline, with a thickness of ≈5–10 nm, is coated uniformly onto the surface of the S/C composite forming a core/shell structure. The PANI@S/C composite with 43.7 wt% sulfur presents the optimum electrochemical performance, including a large reversible capacity, a good coulombic efficiency, and a high active‐sulfur utilization. The formation of the unique core/shell structure in the PANI@S/C composites is responsible for the improvement of the electrochemical performance. In particular, the high‐rate charge/discharge capability of the PANI@S/C composites is excellent due to a synergistic effect on the high electrical conductivity from both the conductive carbon black in the matrix and the PANI on the surface. Even at an ultrahigh rate (10C), a maximum discharge capacity of 635.5 mA h per g of sulfur is still retained for the PANI@S/C composite after activation, and the discharge capacity retention is over 60% after 200 cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Bin Wu, H., Hao, C., Liu, S., Qiu, J., & Lou, X. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6002 · Cited by 1,059
Tao, X., Wang, J., Ying, Z., Cai, Q., Zheng, G., Gan, Y., Huang, H., Xia, Y., Liang, C., Zhang, W., et al. (2014) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl502331f · Cited by 687
Polyaniline (PANi) based electrode materials for energy storage and conversion
Wang, H., Lin, J., & Shen, Z. X. (2016) · Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices · doi:10.1016/j.jsamd.2016.08.001 · Cited by 631
A Review of Functional Binders in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Yuan, H., Huang, J., Peng, H., Titirici, M., Xiang, R., Chen, R., Liu, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201802107 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, G., Li, G., Ye, S., & Gao, X.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1238-1245
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W1998082424
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Polyaniline‐Coated Sulfur/Carbon Composite with an Enhanced High‐Rate Capability as a Cathode Material for Lithium/Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201200017
- The paper
- Li, G., Li, G., Ye, S., & Gao, X. (2012). A Polyaniline‐Coated Sulfur/Carbon Composite with an Enhanced High‐Rate Capability as a Cathode Material for Lithium/Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201200017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.