The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium–Sulfur Cells: The Gap between the State‐of‐the‐Art and the Requirements for High Energy Battery Cells
Open accessAbstract
Li–S cells are considered a highly attractive electrochemical storage system, especially due to their high potential gravimetric energy density. The long‐term target of all Li–S research activities must be to outperform state‐of‐the‐art Li‐ion cells. A current benchmark is the Panasonic NCR18650B, which has a gravimetric energy density of ≈240 Wh kg−1 and several hundred relatively stable cycles. The possible 18650 Li–S cell energies and cell costs are calculated for various sulfur loads, sulfur utilizations, and electrolyte/sulfur ratios with the aim of determining the cell and electrode property values required to outperform the NCR18650B. These values are compared with statistical information obtained from an extensive literature review of 274 Li–S publications over the last 12 years to show the gap between state‐of‐the‐art Li–S research and requirements for high energy density cells. Finally, a carbon nanotubes‐based electrode is introduced, which meets important criteria for obtaining high gravimetric cell energy densities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries
Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Hörpel, G., Placke, T., & Winter, M. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0107-2 · Cited by 3,233
Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets
Cano, Z. P., Banham, D., Ye, S., Hintennach, A., Lu, J., Fowler, M., & Chen, Z. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1 · Cited by 2,873
Review on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Huang, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700260 · Cited by 1,746
Nanostructured Metal Oxides and Sulfides for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Liu, X., Huang, J., Zhang, Q., & Mai, L. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201601759 · Cited by 1,616
Placke, T., Kloepsch, R., Dühnen, S., & Winter, M. (2017) · Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7 · Cited by 1,117
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagen, M., Hanselmann, D., Ahlbrecht, K., Maça, R., Gerber, D., & Tübke, J.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2122141541
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium–Sulfur Cells: The Gap between the State‐of‐the‐Art and the Requirements for High Energy Battery Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201401986
- The paper
- Hagen, M., Hanselmann, D., Ahlbrecht, K., Maça, R., Gerber, D., & Tübke, J. (2015). Lithium–Sulfur Cells: The Gap between the State‐of‐the‐Art and the Requirements for High Energy Battery Cells. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201401986
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.