Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solvent Engineering Boosts the Efficiency of Paintable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Solar Cells to Beyond 14%

Chen, Haining, Wei, Zhanhua, He, Hexiang, Zheng, Xiaoli, Wong, Kam Sing, Yang, Shihe·2016·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

Carbon‐based hole transport material (HTM)‐free perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have shown much promise for practical applications because of their high stability and low cost. However, the efficiencies of this kind of PSCs are still relatively low, especially for the simplest paintable carbon‐based PSCs, in comparison with the organic HTM‐based PSCs. This can be imputed to the perovskite deposition methods that are not very suitable for this kind of devices. A solvent engineering strategy based on two‐step sequential method is exploited to prepare a high‐quality perovskite layer for the paintable carbon‐based PSCs in which the solvent for CH 3 NH 3 I (MAI) solution at the second step is changed from isopropanol (IPA) to a mixed solvent of IPA/Cyclohexane (CYHEX). This mixed solvent not only accelerates the conversion of PbI 2 to CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 but also suppresses the Ostwald ripening process resulting in a high‐quality perovskite layer, e.g., pure phase, even surface, and compact capping layer. The paintable carbon‐based PSCs fabricated from IPA/CYHEX solvent exhibits a considerable enhancement in photovoltaic performance and performance reproducibility in comparison with that from pure IPA, especially on fill factor (FF), owing mainly to the better contact of perovskite/carbon interface, lower trap density in perovskite, higher light absorption ability, and faster charge transport of perovskite layer. As a result, the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 14.38% is obtained, which is a record value for carbon‐based HTM‐free PSCs. Furthermore, a PCE of as high as 10% is achieved for the large area device (1 cm 2), also the highest of its kind.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.201502087

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Chen, H., Wei, Z., He, H., Zheng, X., Wong, K. S., & Yang, S.
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-19
Volume
6
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W2301558318
Cited by
348
References
4
FWCI
27.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solvent Engineering Boosts the Efficiency of Paintable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Solar Cells to Beyond 14%. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201502087
The paper
Chen, H., Wei, Z., He, H., Zheng, X., Wong, K. S., & Yang, S. (2016). Solvent Engineering Boosts the Efficiency of Paintable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Solar Cells to Beyond 14%. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201502087

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.