The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Roll‐to‐Roll Printed Large‐Area All‐Polymer Solar Cells with 5% Efficiency Based on a Low Crystallinity Conjugated Polymer Blend
Open accessAbstract
The challenge of continuous printing in high‐efficiency large‐area organic solar cells is a key limiting factor for their widespread adoption. A materials design concept for achieving large‐area, solution‐coated all‐polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells with stable phase separation morphology between the donor and acceptor is presented. The key concept lies in inhibiting strong crystallization of donor and acceptor polymers, thus forming intermixed, low crystallinity, and mostly amorphous blends. Based on experiments using donors and acceptors with different degree of crystallinity, the results show that microphase separated donor and acceptor domain sizes are inversely proportional to the crystallinity of the conjugated polymers. This methodology of using low crystallinity donors and acceptors has the added benefit of forming a consistent and robust morphology that is insensitive to different processing conditions, allowing one to easily scale up the printing process from a small‐scale solution shearing coater to a large‐scale continuous roll‐to‐roll (R2R) printer. Large‐area all‐polymer solar cells are continuously roll‐to‐roll slot die printed with power conversion efficiencies of 5%, with combined cell area up to 10 cm 2. This is among the highest efficiencies realized with R2R‐coated active layer organic materials on flexible substrate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nika : software for two-dimensional data reduction
Ilavsky, J. (2012) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889812004037 · Cited by 923
Cited by
Wadsworth, A., Moser, M., Marks, A., Little, M. S., Gasparini, N., Brabec, C. J., Baran, D., & McCulloch, I. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00892a · Cited by 986
The meniscus-guided deposition of semiconducting polymers
Gu, X., Shaw, L., Gu, K., Toney, M. F., & Bao, Z. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02833-9 · Cited by 462
Self-citationEnergy autonomous electronic skin
García Núñez, C., Manjakkal, L., & Dahiya, R. (2019) · npj Flexible Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41528-018-0045-x · Cited by 332
Large-Area Soft e-Skin: The Challenges Beyond Sensor Designs
Dahiya, R., Yogeswaran, N., Liu, F., Manjakkal, L., Burdet, E., Hayward, V., & Jörntell, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2941366 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, X., Zhou, Y., Gu, K., Kurosawa, T., Guo, Y., Li, Y., Lin, H., Schroeder, B. C., Yan, H., Molina‐Lopez, F., Tassone, C. J., Wang, C., Mannsfeld, S. C. B., Yan, H., Zhao, D., Toney, M. F., & Bao, Z.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 14
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2592658541
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Roll‐to‐Roll Printed Large‐Area All‐Polymer Solar Cells with 5% Efficiency Based on a Low Crystallinity Conjugated Polymer Blend. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201602742
- The paper
- Gu, X., Zhou, Y., Gu, K., Kurosawa, T., Guo, Y., Li, Y., Lin, H., Schroeder, B. C., Yan, H., Molina‐Lopez, F., Tassone, C. J., Wang, C., Mannsfeld, S. C. B., Yan, H., Zhao, D., Toney, M. F., & Bao, Z. (2017). Roll‐to‐Roll Printed Large‐Area All‐Polymer Solar Cells with 5% Efficiency Based on a Low Crystallinity Conjugated Polymer Blend. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201602742
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.