The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D–2D–0D Interface Profiling for Record Efficiency All‐Inorganic CsPbBrI2 Perovskite Solar Cells with Superior Stability
Open accessAbstract
All‐inorganic CsPbBrI 2 perovskite has great advantages in terms of ambient phase stability and suitable band gap (1.91 eV) for photovoltaic applications. However, the typically used structure causes reduced device performance, primarily due to the large recombination at the interface between the perovskite, and the hole‐extraction layer (HEL). In this paper, an efficient CsPbBrI 2 perovskite solar cell (PSC) with a dimensionally graded heterojunction is reported, in which the CsPbBrI 2 material is distributed within bulk–nanosheet–quantum dots or 3D–2D–0D dimension‐profiled interface structure so that the energy alignment is optimized in between the valence and conduction bands of both CsPbBrI 2 and the HEL layers. Specifically, the valence‐/conduction‐band edge is leveraged to bend with synergistic advantages: the graded combination enhances the hole extraction and conduction efficiency with effectively decreased recombination loss during the hole‐transfer process, leading to an enhanced built‐in electric field, hence a high VOC of as much as 1.19 V. The profiled structure induces continuously upshifted energy levels, resulting in a higher JSC of as much as 12.93 mA cm−2 and fill factor as high as 80.5%, and therefore record power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 12.39%. As far as it is known, this is the highest PCE for CsPbBrI 2 perovskite‐based PSC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved performance and stability in quantum dot solar cells through band alignment engineering
Chuang, C.-H. M., Brown, P. R., Bulović, V., & Bawendi, M. G. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3984 · Cited by 1,795
Strongly emissive perovskite nanocrystal inks for high-voltage solar cells
Akkerman, Q. A., Gandini, M., Di Stasio, F., Rastogi, P., Palazon, F., Bertoni, G., Ball, J. M., Prato, M., Petrozza, A., & Manna, L. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.194 · Cited by 721
Cited by
Perovskite precursor solution chemistry: from fundamentals to photovoltaic applications
Jung, M., Ji, S.-G., Kim, G., & Seok, S. I. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00656c · Cited by 816
Causes and Solutions of Recombination in Perovskite Solar Cells
Chen, J., & Park, N. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201803019 · Cited by 733
Understanding of perovskite crystal growth and film formation in scalable deposition processes
Liu, C., Cheng, Y.-B., & Ge, Z. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00711c · Cited by 675
Recent progress of inorganic perovskite solar cells
Tai, Q., Tang, K.-C., & Yan, F. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee01479a · Cited by 528
Materials and Methods for Interface Engineering toward Stable and Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells
Chen, J., & Park, N.-G. (2020) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01240 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Bai, D., Jin, Z., Bian, H., Wang, K., Sun, J., Wang, Q., & Liu, S. (.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-24
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 15
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2789425555
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D–2D–0D Interface Profiling for Record Efficiency All‐Inorganic CsPbBrI2 Perovskite Solar Cells with Superior Stability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201703246
- The paper
- Zhang, J., Bai, D., Jin, Z., Bian, H., Wang, K., Sun, J., Wang, Q., & Liu, S. (. (2018). 3D–2D–0D Interface Profiling for Record Efficiency All‐Inorganic CsPbBrI2 Perovskite Solar Cells with Superior Stability. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201703246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.