The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimized Catalytic WS2–WO3 Heterostructure Design for Accelerated Polysulfide Conversion in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
The lithium–sulfur (Li–S) battery is a next generation high energy density battery, but its practical application is hindered by the poor cycling stability derived from the severe shuttling of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). Catalysis is a promising way to solve this problem, but the rational design of relevant catalysts is still hard to achieve. This paper reports the WS 2–WO 3 heterostructures prepared by in situ sulfurization of WO 3, and by controlling the sulfurization degree, the structure is controlled, which balances the trapping ability (by WO 3) and catalytic activity (by WS 2) toward LiPSs. As a result, the WS 2–WO 3 heterostructures effectively accelerate LiPS conversion and improve sulfur utilization. The Li–S battery with 5 wt% WS 2–WO 3 heterostructures as additives in the cathode shows an excellent rate performance and good cycling stability, revealing a 0.06% capacity decay each cycle over 500 cycles at 0.5 C. By building an interlayer with such heterostructure‐added graphenes, the battery with a high sulfur loading of 5 mg cm−2 still shows a high capacity retention of 86.1% after 300 cycles at 0.5 C. This work provides a rational way to prepare the metal oxide–sulfide heterostructures with an optimized structure to enhance the performance of Li–S batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Bin Wu, H., Hao, C., Liu, S., Qiu, J., & Lou, X. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6002 · Cited by 1,059
Cited by
Advances in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: From Academic Research to Commercial Viability
Chen, Y., Wang, T., Tian, H., Su, D., Zhang, Q., & Wang, G. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202003666 · Cited by 870
Emerging Catalysts to Promote Kinetics of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Wang, P., Xi, B., Huang, M., Chen, W., Feng, J., & Xiong, S. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202002893 · Cited by 451
Recent Advances in Heterostructure Engineering for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Huang, S., Wang, Z., Von Lim, Y., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, D., & Yang, H. Y. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202003689 · Cited by 438
Ye, Z., Jiang, Y., Li, L., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202002168 · Cited by 394
Liu, W., Luo, C., Zhang, S., Zhang, B., Ma, J., Wang, X., Liu, W., Li, Z., Yang, Q.-H., & Lv, W. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c00896 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, B., Luo, C., Deng, Y., Huang, Z., Zhou, G., Lv, W., He, Y., Wan, Y., Kang, F., & Yang, Q.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02-27
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 15
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W3008593992
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimized Catalytic WS2–WO3 Heterostructure Design for Accelerated Polysulfide Conversion in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.202000091
- The paper
- Zhang, B., Luo, C., Deng, Y., Huang, Z., Zhou, G., Lv, W., He, Y., Wan, Y., Kang, F., & Yang, Q. (2020). Optimized Catalytic WS2–WO3 Heterostructure Design for Accelerated Polysulfide Conversion in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202000091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.