Cited by 7Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Geostatistics and MappingSoil Management and Crop Yield

An inter-laboratory comparison of soil organic carbon analysis on a farm with four agricultural management systems

Open access
Brinton, William, Basso, Bruno, Millar, Neville, Covey, Kris, Bettigole, Charles, Jagadamma, Sindhu, Loeffler, Frank, Kolodney, Shaylan·2025·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) as a key soil health indicator is integral to the soil's capacity to function as a vital living ecosystem that sustains plants, animals, and humans. Accurate SOC estimation is essential to decision‐making for an increasing number of stakeholders, such as farmers, industry professionals, and policymakers, to determine the environmental benefit of agricultural practices, and more recently, allocate financial rewards through carbon market initiatives. Our study examined SOC variability in soils from four different regenerative management systems on a single farm using stratification and sample compositing, and analyzed by four different laboratories using dry combustion, the recommended analytical method, but one which varied according to laboratory standard operating procedures (SOP). Results showed significant variation in SOC levels for the same soil samples at different laboratories (1.6 ± 0.2 g kg−1), variation comparable to that between the distinct management systems (1.5 ± 0.4 g kg−1). Our findings show that analytical variability within and between laboratories must be considered, that use of the same laboratory, and to the extent possible the same SOP for successive SOC measurements at the same location is necessary, and that rigorous stratification alongside minimal sample consolidation should be conducted to generate analytical sample numbers that cater to logistics, economics, and scientific rigor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/agj2.70018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soil samples were analyzed across different laboratories, introducing unknown uncertainty from differences in sample handling and processing, despite all using dry combustion, the analytical gold standard.

    “Soil samples were also analyzed across different laboratories, introducing unknown uncertainty from differences in sample handling and processing, despite all using dry combustion, the analytical gold standard (Brinton et al., 2025;Even et al., 2025).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. S Allison, L. E. (1960). Wet combustion apparatus and procedure for organic and inorganic carbon in soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 24, 36-40. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1960. · DOI
  2. 03615995002400010018x · DOI
  3. Ball, D. F. (1964). Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of organic matter and organic carbon in non-calcareous soils. Journal of Soil Science, 15, 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1964.tb00247.x · DOI
  4. Barbieri, P., Pellerin, S., & Nesme, T. (2017). Comparing crop rota- tions between organic and conventional farming. Scientific Reports, 7, 13761. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14271-6 · DOI
  5. Bengtsson, J., Ahnstrom, J., & Weibull, A. C. (2005). The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1365-2664.2005.01005.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bisutti, I., Hilke, M., & Raessler, M. (2004). Determination of total organic carbon-An overview of current methods. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 23(10-11), 716-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.trac.2004.09.003 · DOI
  7. Bossio, D. A., Cook-Patton, S. C., Ellis, P. W., Fargione, J., Sanderman, J., Smith, P., Wood, S., Zomer, R. J., von Unger, M., Emmer, I. M., & Griscom, B. W. (2020). The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nature Sustainability, 3, 391-398. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41893-020-0491-z · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bouzahzah, H., Benzaazoua, M., Plante, B., & Bussiere, B. (2015). A quantitative approach for the estimation of the "fizz rating" parameter in the acid-base accounting tests: A new adaptation of the Sobek test. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 153, 53-65. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.gexplo.2015.03.003 · DOI
  9. Bowman, R. A., Reeder, J. D., & Wienhold, B. J. (2002). Quantify- ing laboratory and field variability to assess potential for carbon sequestration. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 33, 1629-1642. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120004304 · DOI
  10. Chatterjee, A., Lal, R., Wielopolski, L., Martin, M. Z., & Ebinger, M. H. (2009). Evaluation of different soil carbon determination methods. Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 28(3), 164-178. https://doi.org/10. 1080/07352680902776556 · DOI
  11. de Gruijter, J. J., McBratney, A. B., Minasny, B., Wheeler, I., Malone, B. P., & Stockmann, U. (2016). Farm-scale soil carbon auditing. Geoderma, 265, 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015. 11.010 · DOI
  12. Doran, J. W., & Parkin, T. B. (1994). Defining and assessing soil quality. In J. W. Doran, D. C. Coleman, D. F. Bezdicek, & B. A. Stewart (Eds.), Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment (pp. 3-21). SSSA.
  13. Even, R. J., Machmuller, M. B., Lavallee, J. M., Zelikova, T. J., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2024). Large errors in common soil carbon measure- ments due to sample processing, EGUsphere. https://doi.org/10.5194/ egusphere-2024-1470 · DOI
  14. Fowler, A., Basso, B., Maureira, F., Millar, N., Ulbrich, R., & Brinton, W. F. (2024). Spatial patterns of historical crop yields reveal soil health attributes in US Midwest fields. Scientific Reports, 14, 465. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51155-y · DOI
  15. Freibaur, A., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Smith, P., & Verhagen, J. (2004). Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe. Geoderma, 122, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.021 · DOI
  16. Goidts, E., Van Wesemael, B., & Crucifix, M. (2009). Magnitude and sources of uncertainties in soil organic carbon stock assessments at various scales. European Journal of Soil Science, 60, 723-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01157.x · DOI
  17. Jimenez, R. R., & Ladha, J. K. (1993). Automated elemental analy- sis: A rapid and reliable but expensive measurement of total carbon and nitrogen in plant and soil samples. Communications in Soil Sci- ence and Plant Analysis, 24, 1897-1924. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00103629309368926 · DOI
  18. Lal, R. (2023). Carbon farming by recarbonization of agroecosystems. Pedosphere, 33(5), 676-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2023. 07.024 · DOI
  19. Lawrence, P. G., Roper, W., Morris, T. F., & Guillard, K. (2020). Guid- ing soil sampling strategies using classical and spatial statistics: A review. Agronomy Journal, 112, 493-510. https://doi.org/10.1002/ agj2.20048 · DOI
  20. Lipper, L., Thornton, P., Campbell, B., Baedeker, T., Braimoh, A., Bwalya, M., Caron, P., Cattaneo, A., Garrity, D., Henry, K., Hottle, R., Jackson, L., Jarvis, A., Kossam, F., Mann, W., McCarthy, N., Meybeck, A., Neufeldt, H., Remington, T., . . . Torquebiau, E. F. (2014). Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nature Climate Change, 4, 1068-1072. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2437 · DOI
  21. Martin, G., Durand, J. L., Duru, M., Gastal, F., Julier, B., Litrico, I., Louarn, G., Médiène, S., Moureau, D., Valentin-Morrison, M., Novak, S., Parnaudeau, V., Paschalidou, F., Vertès, F., Voisin, A., Cellier, P., & Jeuffroy, M. (2020). Role of ley pastures in tomorrow's cropping systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00620-9 · DOI
  22. Matejovic, I. (1997). Determination of carbon and nitrogen in samples of various soils by dry combustion. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 28(17-18), 1499-1511. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00103629709369892 · DOI
  23. Necpálová, M., Anex, R. P., Kravchenko, A. N., Abendroth, L. J., Del Grosso, S. J., Dick, W. A., Helmers, M. J., Herzmann, D., Lauer, J. G., Nafziger, E. D., Sawyer, J. E., Scharf, P. C., Strock, J. S., & Villamil, M. B. (2014). What does it take to detect a change in soil carbon stock? Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 69(6), 517-531. https://doi. org/10.2489/jswc.69.6.517 · DOI
  24. Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In D. L. Sparks, A. L. Page, P. A. Helmke, R. H. Loeppert, P. N. Soltanpour, M. A. Tabatabai, C. T. Johnston, & M. E. Sumner (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 chemical methods (pp. 961-1010). Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10. 2136/sssabookser5.3.c34 · DOI
  25. Norton, L., Johnson, P., Joys, A., Stuart, R., Chamberlain, D., Feber, R., Firbank, L., Manley, W., Zolfe, M., Hart, B., Mathews, F., Macdonald, D., & Fuller, R. J. (2009). Consequences of organic and non-organic farming practices for field, farm and landscape complexity. Agricul- ture, Ecosystems & Environment, 129, 221-227. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.agee.2008.09.002 · DOI
  26. Pérez, D. V., Alcantara, S., Arruda, R. J., & Menegheli, N. A. (2001). Comparing two methods for soil carbon and nitrogen deter- mination using selected Brazilian soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32, 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1081/ CSS-100103008 · DOI
  27. Ross, D. S., Bailey, S. W., Briggs, R. D., Curry, J., Fernandez, I. J., Fredriksen, G., Goodale, C. L., Hazlett, P. W., Heine, P. R., Johnson, C. E., Larson, J. T., Lawrence, G. B., Kolka, R. K., Ouimet, R., Paré, D., Richter, D. D. B., Schirmer, C. D., & Warby, R. A. (2015). Inter-laboratory variation in the chemical analysis of acidic forest soil reference samples from eastern North America. Ecosphere, 6(5), 73. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00209. · DOI
  28. Schulte, E. E., Kaufmann, C., & Peter, J. B. (1991). The influence of sample size and heating time on soil weight loss-on-ignition. Com- munications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 22(1-2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629109368402 · DOI
  29. Schulz, F., Brock, C., Schmidt, H., Franz, K. P., & Leithold, G. (2013). Development of soil organic matter stocks under different farm types and tillage systems in the Organic Arable Farming Experiment Glad- bacherhof. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 60(3), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2013.794935 · DOI
  30. Soon, Y. K., & Abboud, S. (1991). A comparison of some meth- ods for soil organic carbon determination. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 22, 943-954. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00103629109368465 · DOI
  31. Spertus, J. V. (2021). Optimal sampling and assay for estimating soil organic carbon. Open Journal of Soil Science, 11(2), 93-121.
  32. Stanley, P., Spertus, J., Chiartas, J., Stark, P. B., & Bowles, T. (2023). Valid inferences about soil carbon in heterogeneous landscapes. Geoderma, 430, 116323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022. 116323 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Wade, J., Culman, S. W., Hurisso, T., Miller, R. O., Baker, L., & Horwath, W. R. (2018). Sources of variability that compromise min- eralizable carbon as a soil health indicator. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 82, 243-252. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.03. 0105 · DOI
  34. Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modifi- cation of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 · DOI
  35. Wang, D. L., & Anderson, D. W. (1998). Direct measurement of organic carbon content in soils by the Leco CR-12 carbon analyzer. Com- munications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 29(1-2), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629809369925 · DOI
  36. Wright, A. F., & Bailey, J. S. (2001). Organic carbon, total carbon, and total nitrogen determination in soils of variable calcium car- bonate contents using a LECO CN-2000 dry combustion analyzer. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32, 3243-3258. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120001118 · DOI
  37. Zhou, W., Guana, K., Peng, B., Margenot, A., Lee, D., Tang, J., Jin, Z., Grant, R., DeLucia, E., Qin, Z., Wander, M. M., & Wang, S. (2023). How does uncertainty of soil organic carbon stock affect the cal- culation of carbon budgets and soil carbon credits for croplands in the U.S. Midwest? Geoderma, 429, 116254. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.geoderma.2022.116254 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brinton, W., Basso, B., Millar, N., Covey, K., Bettigole, C., Jagadamma, S., Loeffler, F., & Kolodney, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Maine (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Skidmore College Saratoga Springs New York USA
  • Skidmore College (US)
  • University of Tennessee System (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Brinton, William
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-01
Volume
117
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W4407420026
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2020‐67021‐32799)
  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NR213A750013G001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil organic carbon, interlaboratory comparison, analytical variability, regenerative agriculture, farm management systems, sample stratification, standard operating procedures, soil health, emissions trading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review