The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multimode process monitoring with Bayesian inference‐based finite Gaussian mixture models
Abstract
For complex industrial processes with multiple operating conditions, the traditional multivariate process monitoring techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS) are ill‐suited because the fundamental assumption that the operating data follow a unimodal Gaussian distribution usually becomes invalid. In this article, a novel multimode process monitoring approach based on finite Gaussian mixture model (FGMM) and Bayesian inference strategy is proposed. First, the process data are assumed to be from a number of different clusters, each of which corresponds to an operating mode and can be characterized by a Gaussian component. In the absence of a priori process knowledge, the Figueiredo–Jain (F–J) algorithm is then adopted to automatically optimize the number of Gaussian components and estimate their statistical distribution parameters. With the obtained FGMM, a Bayesian inference strategy is further utilized to compute the posterior probabilities of each monitored sample belonging to the multiple components and derive an integrated global probabilistic index for fault detection of multimode processes. The validity and effectiveness of the proposed monitoring approach are illustrated through three examples: (1) a simple multivariate linear system, (2) a simulated continuous stirred tank heater (CSTH) process, and (3) the Tennessee Eastman challenge problem. The comparison of monitoring results demonstrates that the proposed approach is superior to the conventional PCA method and can achieve accurate and early detection of various types of faults in multimode processes. © 2008 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2008
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks for pattern recognition
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-5500 · Cited by 18,538
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Wold, S., Esbensen, K., & Geladi, P. (1987) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 · Cited by 11,606
Chiang, L. H., Russell, E. L., & Braatz, R. D. (2001) · Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0347-9_3 · Cited by 5,003
Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy
Frank, P. M. (1990) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(90)90018-d · Cited by 3,545
A plant-wide industrial process control problem
Downs, J. J., & Vogel, E. F. (1993) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/0098-1354(93)80018-i · Cited by 3,348
Process fault detection based on modeling and estimation methods—A survey
Isermann, R. (1984) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(84)90098-0 · Cited by 2,364
Unsupervised learning of finite mixture models
Figueiredo, M. A. T., & Jain, A. K. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.990138 · Cited by 2,125
Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond
Joe Qin, S. (2003) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.800 · Cited by 1,582
Box, G. E. P. (1954) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728786 · Cited by 1,513
Cited by
Data Mining and Analytics in the Process Industry: The Role of Machine Learning
Ge, Z., Song, Z., Ding, S. X., & Huang, B. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2756872 · Cited by 922
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, J., & Qin, S. J.
- Venue
- AIChE Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-09
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1811-1829
- ISSN
- 0001-1541 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5905
- OpenAlex
- W2036887017
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 25.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multimode process monitoring with Bayesian inference‐based finite Gaussian mixture models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aic.11515
- The paper
- Yu, J., & Qin, S. J. (2008). Multimode process monitoring with Bayesian inference‐based finite Gaussian mixture models. AIChE Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.