The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concurrent monitoring of operating condition deviations and process dynamics anomalies with slow feature analysis
Open accessAbstract
Latent variable (LV) models have been widely used in multivariate statistical process monitoring. However, whatever deviation from nominal operating condition is detected, an alarm is triggered based on classical monitoring methods. Therefore, they fail to distinguish real faults incurring dynamics anomalies from normal deviations in operating conditions. A new process monitoring strategy based on slow feature analysis (SFA) is proposed for the concurrent monitoring of operating point deviations and process dynamics anomalies. Slow features as LVs are developed to describe slowly varying dynamics, yielding improved physical interpretation. In addition to classical statistics for monitoring deviation from design conditions, two novel indices are proposed to detect anomalies in process dynamics through the slowness of LVs. The proposed approach can distinguish whether the changes in operating conditions are normal or real faults occur. Two case studies show the validity of the SFA‐based process monitoring approach. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 3666–3682, 2015
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications
Hyvärinen, A., & Oja, E. (2000) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00026-5 · Cited by 8,705
Casella, G., & Berger, R. (2024) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003456285 · Cited by 5,711
A plant-wide industrial process control problem
Downs, J. J., & Vogel, E. F. (1993) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/0098-1354(93)80018-i · Cited by 3,348
Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond
Joe Qin, S. (2003) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.800 · Cited by 1,582
Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis
Ku, W., Storer, R. H., & Georgakis, C. (1995) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/0169-7439(95)00076-3 · Cited by 1,483
Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis
Qin, S. J. (2012) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.09.004 · Cited by 1,470
Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems
Braatz, L. H. C. (2001) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/12/10/706 · Cited by 1,416
Slow Feature Analysis: Unsupervised Learning of Invariances
Wiskott, L., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602317318938 · Cited by 1,350
Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems
Chiang, L. H., Russell, E. L., & Braatz, R. D. (2001) · Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0347-9 · Cited by 1,318
Metadata
- Authors
- Shang, C., Yang, F., Gao, X., Huang, X., Suykens, J. A. K., & Huang, D.
- Venue
- AIChE Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3666-3682
- ISSN
- 0001-1541 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5905
- OpenAlex
- W2111637385
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concurrent monitoring of operating condition deviations and process dynamics anomalies with slow feature analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aic.14888
- The paper
- Shang, C., Yang, F., Gao, X., Huang, X., Suykens, J. A. K., & Huang, D. (2015). Concurrent monitoring of operating condition deviations and process dynamics anomalies with slow feature analysis. AIChE Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.