The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The promise of artificial intelligence in chemical engineering: Is it here, finally?
Open accessAbstract
BackgroundT he current excitement about artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML), is palpable and contagious.The expectation that AI is poised to "revolutionize," perhaps even take over, humanity has elicited prophetic visions and concerns from some luminaries.[1][2][3][4] There is also a great deal of interest in the commercial potential of AI, which is attracting significant sums of venture capital and state-sponsored investment globally, particularly in China.5 McKinsey, for instance, predicts the potential commercial impact of AI in several domains, envisioning markets worth trillions of dollars.6 All this is driven by the sudden, explosive, and surprising advances AI has made in the last 10 years or so.AlphaGo, autonomous cars, Alexa, Watson, and other such systems, in game playing, robotics, computer vision, speech recognition, and natural language processing are indeed stunning advances.But, as with earlier AI breakthroughs, such as expert systems in the 1980s and neural networks in the 1990s, there is also considerable hype and a tendency to overestimate the promise of these advances, as market research firm Gartner and others have noted about emerging technology.7 It is quite understandable that many chemical engineers are excited about the potential applications of AI, and ML in particular, 8 for use in such applications as catalyst design.[9][10][11] It might seem that this prospect offers a novel approach to challenging, long-standing problems in chemical engineering using AI.However, the use of AI in chemical engineering is not new-it is, in fact, a 35-year-old ongoing program with some remarkable successes along the way.This article is aimed broadly at chemical engineers who are interested in the prospects for AI in our domain, as well as at researchers new to this area.The objectives of this article are threefold.First, to review the progress we have made so far, highlighting past efforts that contain valuable lessons for the future.Second, drawing on these lessons, to identify promising current and future opportunities for AI in chemical engineering.To avoid getting caught up in the current excitement and to assess the prospects more carefully, it is important to take such a longer and broader view, as a "reality check."Third, since AI is going to play an increasingly dominant role in chemical engineering research and education, it is important to recount and record, however incomplete, certain early milestones for historical purposes.It is apparent that chemical engineering is at an important crossroads.Our discipline is undergoing an unprecedented transition-one that presents significant challenges and opportunities in modeling and automated decision-making.This has been driven by the convergence of cheap and powerful computing and communications platforms, tremendous progress in molecular engineering, the ever-increasing automation of globally integrated operations, tightening environmental constraints, and business demands for speedier delivery of goods and services to market.One important outcome from this convergence is the generation, use, and management of massive amounts of diverse data, information, and knowledge, and this is where AI, particularly ML, would play an important role.So, what is AI?The term was coined in 1956 at a math conference at Dartmouth College.Over the years, there have been many definitions of AI, but I have always found the following to be simple, visionary, and useful 12 : "Artificial Intelligence is the study of how to make computers do things at which, at the moment, people are better."Note that this definition does not say which "things."The implication is that AI could eventually end up doing all "things" that humans do, and do them much better-that is, achieve super-human performance as witnessed recently with AlphaGO 13 and AlphaGO Zero.14 This implication is sometimes called the central dogma of AI.Historically, the term AI reflected collectively to the following branches:• Game playing-for example, Chess, Go • Symbolic reasoning and theorem-proving-for example, Logic Theorist, MACSYMA • Robotics-for example, self-driving cars
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects
Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A., & Kim, C. (2017) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 · Cited by 1,945
Tran, K., & Ulissi, Z. W. (2018) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-018-0142-1 · Cited by 920
Machine Learning in Computer-Aided Synthesis Planning
Coley, C. W., Green, W. H., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00087 · Cited by 704
Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970.
Simon, H. A., & Newell, A. (1971) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0030806 · Cited by 635
Modeling chemical processes using prior knowledge and neural networks'
Thompson, M. L., & Kramer, M. A. (1994) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690400806 · Cited by 596
Materials Synthesis Insights from Scientific Literature via Text Extraction and Machine Learning
Kim, E., Huang, K., Saunders, A., McCallum, A., Ceder, G., & Olivetti, E. (2017) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03500 · Cited by 473
Early expert systems: Where are they now?
Gill, T. G. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249711 · Cited by 181
Cited by
Advances and opportunities in machine learning for process data analytics
Qin, S. J., & Chiang, L. H. (2019) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.04.003 · Cited by 351
Perspectives on the integration between first-principles and data-driven modeling
Bradley, W., Kim, J., Kilwein, Z., Blakely, L., Eydenberg, M., Jalvin, J., Laird, C., & Boukouvala, F. (2022) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107898 · Cited by 231
A review and perspective on hybrid modeling methodologies
Schweidtmann, A. M., Zhang, D., & von Stosch, M. (2024) · Digital Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.dche.2023.100136 · Cited by 178
Optimization of formulations using robotic experiments driven by machine learning DoE
Cao, L., Russo, D., Felton, K., Salley, D., Sharma, A., Keenan, G., Mauer, W., Gao, H., Cronin, L., & Lapkin, A. A. (2021) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100295 · Cited by 75
A framework of hybrid model development with identification of plant-model mismatch
Chen, Y., & Ierapetritou, M. (2020) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.16996 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Venkatasubramanian, V.
- Venue
- AIChE Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-19
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 466-478
- ISSN
- 0001-1541 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5905
- OpenAlex
- W2903010511
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 31.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The promise of artificial intelligence in chemical engineering: Is it here, finally? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aic.16489
- The paper
- Venkatasubramanian, V. (2019). The promise of artificial intelligence in chemical engineering: Is it here, finally? AIChE Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16489
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.