The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Economics of land‐based carbon mitigation
Abstract
Agricultural land holds tremendous potential to contribute to net zero greenhouse gas emission goals by providing low carbon renewable energy to displace fossil fuels and by serving as a sink for sequestering carbon in the soil with climate‐smart practices. This potential is, however, far from being realized. This paper examines the economic incentives and barriers to implementing land‐based carbon mitigation strategies and discusses the specific features of land‐based carbon mitigation practices on carbon emissions that need to be considered in designing policy incentives to induce adoption. Although a carbon price‐based policy is socially efficient, the more commonly observed policies to promote land‐based carbon mitigation include practice‐based conservation programs, technology mandates, and sector‐specific standards. The paper discusses the rationale for these alternative policy approaches and concludes with a discussion of emerging opportunities for designing policy and market‐based approaches for promoting land‐based carbon‐mitigation and future directions for economics research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 91
- 10.1111/agec.12501 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1038/s44168-023-00055-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/s44264-025-00073-1 · DOI
- 10.2134/agronj2018.02.0077 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2489/jswc.2021.00027 · DOI
- 10.1088/1748-9326/abd7af · DOI
- 10.1093/erae/jbaf018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.09.006 · DOI
- 10.3368/le.94.1.19 · DOI · Paper page
- Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, Potential for U.S. Agriculture to Be Greenhouse Gas Negative
- 10.1111/gcb.16489 · DOI
- 10.1093/erae/jbz019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173872 · DOI
- 10.1128/msystems.01337-21 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.101.6.2350 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.023 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajae/aar067 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.20150474 · DOI · Paper page
- Fan X., 2026, Supplementing Biofuel Mandates with a Carbon Mitigation Policy Can Lead to Water Quality Co‐Benefits, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2024, Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agrifood Systems. Global, Regional and Country Trends, 2000–2022
- 10.1038/s43016-024-01039-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.01.015 · DOI
- 10.1257/pol.1.1.106 · DOI
- 10.2172/1756713 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781107415416 · DOI
- Isik M., 2002, Variable‐Rate Nitrogen Application Under Uncertainty: Implications for Profitability and Nitrogen Use, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27, 61
- 10.1111/1467-8276.00121 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.adw6739 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-resource-110811-114523 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00089.x · DOI
- 10.1111/agec.12332 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8489.12461 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/713026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.atech.2025.101647 · DOI
- Langholtz M. H., 2024, 2023 Billion‐Ton Report: An Assessment of US Renewable Carbon Resources
- 10.1093/erae/jbad036 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108111 · DOI
- Liu J. Y., 2025, The Price Gap in Agriculture‐Based Greenhouse Gas Offset Markets, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 0, 1
- 10.1093/erae/jbad029 · DOI
- 10.32747/2024.8374829.ers · DOI
- Majeed F., 2025, Designing Cost‐Effective Carbon Payments to Induce Cellulosic Feedstock Production for Sustainable Aviation Fuel, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 1
- 10.1016/j.crsust.2025.100317 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-41242-5 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1074070800020642 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajae/aas107 · DOI
- Miao R., 2014, Are Bioenergy Crops Riskier Than Corn? Implications for Biomass Price, Choices, 29, 1
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.018 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-resource-110319-115428 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100153 · DOI
- 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1011201 · DOI
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2019, Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2024, Utility‐Scale Solar Fields Can Foster Abundant Biodiversity
- 10.1073/pnas.2022666118 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100077 · DOI
- 10.3368/le.93.3.437 · DOI
- 10.1071/EA05037 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102840 · DOI
- 10.1002/agj2.21519 · DOI
- 10.1080/17583004.2019.1633231 · DOI
- 10.3389/fclim.2019.00008 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1742170518000194 · DOI
- Plastina A., 2024, Pervasive Disadoption Substantially Offsets New Adoption of Cover Crops and No‐Till, Choices, 39, 1
- Plastina A., 2024, ‘How to Grow and Sell Carbon Credits in US Agriculture.’ Ag Decision Maker File A1‐76
- 10.2489/jswc.74.5.520 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-54536-z · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-resource-112923-013308 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/agronomy12092011 · DOI
- 10.1093/aepp/ppv022 · DOI
- 10.1111/gcb.15873 · DOI
- 10.2489/jswc.2021.00115 · DOI
- Searchinger T., 2019, Creating a Sustainable Food Future: A Menu of Solutions to Feed Nearly 10 Billion People by 2050
- 10.1086/733661 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.socec.2023.102158 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112922 · DOI
- Tinbergen J., 1952, On the Theory of Economic Policy
- Trust in Food, 2022, Ag Carbon Markets and US Farmers. A Farm Journal Initiative
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2023, Report to Congress: A General Assessment of the Role of Agriculture and Forestry in U.S. Carbon Markets
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2022, Agriculture Sector Emissions
- U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2024, Precision Agriculture: Benefits and Challenges for Technology Adoption and Use
- 10.2134/jeq2007.0349 · DOI
- Wallander S., 2021, Cover Crop Trends, Programs, and Practices in the United States
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107950 · DOI
- 10.1038/s43247-025-02913-x · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053654 · DOI
- 10.1002/aepp.13254 · DOI
- 10.1111/gcbb.12903 · DOI
- Zhang N.2025.“Economic incentives for adoption of alternative crops in the rainfed US.” PhD dissertation. University of Illinois Urbana‐Champaign
Metadata
- Authors
- Khanna, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-01-27
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 443-461
- ISSN
- 0002-9092
- 1467-8276
- Cited by
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economics of land‐based carbon mitigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajae.70056
- The paper
- Khanna, M. (2026). Economics of land‐based carbon mitigation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajae.70056