The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inducing the adoption of emerging technologies for sustainable intensification of food and renewable energy production: insights from applied economics*
Abstract
Emerging advances in sustainable intensification technologies have the potential to transform land use and crop management approaches in ways that can increase resource productivity and reduce adverse environmental impacts of agricultural production. This paper describes emerging technologies that can sustainably intensify food and renewable energy production. We apply the findings from studies examining the adoption of technologies with similar stylized features to provide insights about the incentives and barriers for the adoption of these emerging technologies. We also present a landscape‐based systems approach, based on welfare economics, to go beyond relying on a positive approach to explain observed adoption decisions to examining normative questions about the optimal mix, level, and location of adoption of these technologies to achieve desired societal outcomes. We conclude with a discussion of the insights from applied economics for the design of policy incentives to achieve these outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microeconomics of technology adoption
Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124433 · Cited by 1,055
Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems
Pretty, J. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav0294 · Cited by 655
Cost of Abating Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Cellulosic Ethanol
Dwivedi, P., Wang, W., Hudiburg, T., Jaiswal, D., Parton, W., Long, S., DeLucia, E., & Khanna, M. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es5052588 · Cited by 79
Self-citationHoush, M., Yaeger, M. A., Cai, X., McIsaac, G. F., Khanna, M., Sivapalan, M., Ouyang, Y., Al-Qadi, I., & Jain, A. K. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02712 · Cited by 30
Self-citationChen, L., Blanc-Betes, E., Hudiburg, T. W., Hellerstein, D., Wallander, S., DeLucia, E. H., & Khanna, M. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c06133 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 74
- Ancev T., 2006, The economics of efficient phosphorus abatement in a watershed, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 31, 529
- 10.1111/agec.12501 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41893‐019‐0364‐5 · DOI · Paper page
- Bocquého G., 2015, Paper Presented in Journées de Recherche En Sciences Sociales de La SFER
- 10.2307/1242126 · DOI
- 10.1002/aepp.13003 · DOI
- 10.1088/1748‐9326/abd7af · DOI
- 10.3389/fenvs.2020.00140 · DOI
- 10.1111/gcbb.12307 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/ajae/aax051 · DOI
- 10.1002/aepp.13007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/aepp/ppz023 · DOI
- 10.1093/erae/jbz019 · DOI
- 10.1515/9781400830176 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/aer.101.6.2350 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.02.009 · DOI
- 10.1093/aepp/ppu044 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.20150474 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.est.0c04358 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10452 · DOI · Paper page
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2020, FAOSTAT
- Gine X., 2005, Credit constraints as a barrier to technology adoption by the poor: lessons from South Indian small‐scale fishery, World Bank
- 10.1142/S2382624X1550006X · DOI
- 10.1038/NENERGY.2015.5 · DOI
- 10.3390/s17061379 · DOI
- 10.2307/40987104 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467‐8276.00121 · DOI
- 10.1017/age.2019.22 · DOI
- 10.1561/101.00000102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.021 · DOI
- 10.1111/0002‐9092.00135 · DOI
- 10.1002/aepp.13103 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev‐resource‐110811‐114523 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574‐0862.2000.tb00089.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574‐0862.2002.tb00113.x · DOI
- 10.1111/agec.12332 · DOI
- 10.1086/713026 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00553-8 · DOI
- 10.1142/S2010007812500169 · DOI
- Khanna M., 2014, Oxford Handbook of Land Economics
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1243867 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574‐0864.2006.00112.x · DOI
- 10.2134/agronj2018.12.0779 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajae/aar142 · DOI
- 10.1111/gcbb.12152 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.018 · DOI
- 10.1093/AEPP/PPX031 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev‐resource‐110319‐115428 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41893-019-0388-x · DOI
- 10.3390/agronomy10111658z027 · DOI
- 10.2172/1086349 · DOI
- 10.3390/agronomy10121885 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41893-020-00617-y · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1477‐8947.1997.tb00699.x · DOI
- 10.3390/su13010137 · DOI
- Rogers E.M., 1962, Diffusion of innovations
- 10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087 · DOI
- 10.3390/su13020711 · DOI
- 10.3390/ENVIRONMENTS6060065 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.027 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajae/aar018 · DOI
- 10.1002/aepp.13006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1757‐1707.2010.01053.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev‐resource‐100516‐053654 · DOI
- 10.1002/aepp.13004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.023 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13593-019-0581-3 · DOI
- 10.3390/land8110157 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature15743 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Khanna, M., & Miao, R.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 1364-985X
- 1467-8489
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review