The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants
Open accessAbstract
Since its discovery in 1907, polyploidy has been recognized as an important phenomenon in vascular plants, and several lines of evidence indicate that most, if not all, plant species ultimately have a polyploid ancestry. However, previous estimates of the frequency of polyploid speciation suggest that the formation and establishment of neopolyploid species is rare. By combining information from the botanical community's vast cytogenetic and phylogenetic databases, we establish that 15% of angiosperm and 31% of fern speciation events are accompanied by ploidy increase. These frequency estimates are higher by a factor of four than earlier estimates and lead to a standing incidence of polyploid species within genera of 35% ( n = 1,506). Despite this high incidence, we find no direct evidence that polyploid lines, once established, enjoy greater net species diversification. Thus, the widespread occurrence of polyploid taxa appears to result from the substantial contribution of polyploidy to cladogenesis, but not from subsequent increases in diversification rates of polyploid lines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: Have we grossly underestimated the number of species?
(2007) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/25065732 · Cited by 452
Cited by
Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J. W., Baird, S. J. E., Bierne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C. A., Buggs, R., et al. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x · Cited by 2,194
Recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates
Mayrose, I., Zhan, S. H., Rothfels, C. J., Magnuson-Ford, K., Barker, M. S., Rieseberg, L. H., & Otto, S. P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207205 · Cited by 489
Self-citationThe origins of reproductive isolation in plants
Baack, E., Melo, M. C., Rieseberg, L. H., & Ortiz‐Barrientos, D. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13424 · Cited by 403
Self-citationOn the relative abundance of autopolyploids and allopolyploids
Barker, M. S., Arrigo, N., Baniaga, A. E., Li, Z., & Levin, D. A. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13698 · Cited by 393
Self-citationImpact of whole‐genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms
Landis, J. B., Soltis, D. E., Li, Z., Marx, H. E., Barker, M. S., Tank, D. C., & Soltis, P. S. (2018) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.1002/ajb2.1060 · Cited by 359
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, T. E., Takebayashi, N., Barker, M. S., Mayrose, I., Greenspoon, P. B., & Rieseberg, L. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-08-18
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 13875-13879
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2170806459
- Cited by
- 1,438
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 63.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0811575106
- The paper
- Wood, T. E., Takebayashi, N., Barker, M. S., Mayrose, I., Greenspoon, P. B., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2009). The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811575106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.