Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 459 of the 459 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polyploidy, the Nucleotype, and Novelty: The Impact of Genome Doubling on the Biology of the Cell

Doyle, Jeff J., Coate, Jeremy E.·2019·International Journal of Plant Sciences

Abstract

Polyploidy is a key mechanism of genome evolution and speciation, particularly in plants. Many aspects of polyploidy have been elucidated with the tools that have become available during the molecular genetics and genomics revolution. Nevertheless, significant questions remain about how genome doubling per se, in the absence of hybridization, is capable of generating evolutionary novelty. This is particularly true at the cellular level, where since the discovery of polyploidy it has been assumed that increased cell size plays a key role in physiological and developmental changes associated with genome doubling, usually through changing the surface-to-volume ratio. Cell size, nuclear volume, and cell cycle duration have been hypothesized to be among a suite of “nucleotypic” characters, defined as phenotypic traits influenced by bulk DNA amount, irrespective of genic content. We update this old but still relevant concept, focusing on what current knowledge from cell biology can elucidate about how quantitative differences between diploids and isogenic autopolyploids could lead to phenotypic differences. Much remains to be learned before causality and correlation can be distinguished in the complex network of interactions among the cytoplasm, the nucleus and other organelles, the cell cycle, metabolism, and intra- and intercellular transport. It is clear that many effects of polyploidy are likely to be cell type specific and are conditioned by the different genomic architectures of species in which genome doubling occurs. The rapidly developing ability to study key processes such as transcription and the movement of molecules in single cells will enable experiments capable of addressing fundamental questions about potentially nucleotypic aspects of genome doubling and how these interact with genotypes to produce phenotypic novelty.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/700636

Cites

459 of 459 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 459 references

Cited by

  • Genomics of plant speciation

    Bock, D. G., Cai, Z., Elphinstone, C., González-Segovia, E., Hirabayashi, K., Huang, K., Keais, G. L., Kim, A., Owens, G. L., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2023) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100599 · Cited by 84

    “These findings have shaped new questions on the study of polyploidy (Soltis et al., 2010), which increasingly focus on the role of ancient WGDs as catalysts of ecological innovation and evolutionary diversification (Wood et al., 2009; Doyle and Coate, 2019; Baniaga et al., 2020).”

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Doyle, J. J., & Coate, J. E.
Venue
International Journal of Plant Sciences
Published
2019-01
Volume
180
Issue
1
Pages
1-52
ISSN
  • 1058-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5315
OpenAlex
W2904024885
Cited by
365
References
459
FWCI
24.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polyploidy, the Nucleotype, and Novelty: The Impact of Genome Doubling on the Biology of the Cell. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/700636
The paper
Doyle, J. J., & Coate, J. E. (2019). Polyploidy, the Nucleotype, and Novelty: The Impact of Genome Doubling on the Biology of the Cell. International Journal of Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1086/700636

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.