Cited by 9Body Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, DietHuman Health and Disease

Body adiposity index to analyze the percentage of fat in young men aged between 7 and 17 years.

Open access
Macêdo Cesário, Tatianny, Almeida‐Neto, Paulo Francisco, Matos, Dihogo Gama, Wells, Jonathan, Aidar, Felipe J., Costa, Roberto Fernandes, Araújo Tinoco Cabral, Breno Guilherme·2021·American Journal of Human Biology

Abstract

Background The body adiposity index (BAI), uses anthropometry to estimate percent body fat (%F). However, previous studies have shown that the BAI has limited accuracy for children and adolescents. Objective We propose to develop and validate an adjusted BAI for use in male children and adolescents from 7 to 17 years of age. Methods The sample consisted of 141 physically active male children and adolescents (age: 12.5 ± 2.14). The %F was determined by X-ray dual energy absorptometry equipment (DXA) as the standard method and by BAI, using an equation that uses height and hip circumference. Arithmetic modeling was used to adjust the structure of the BAI mathematical model. Results The BAI arithmetic adjustment was successful, resulting in the mathematical model named in the present study of adjusted body adiposity index (BAIADJ). BAI and BAIADJ correlated with DXA (r ≤ .70, p < .001). Regression analyzes indicate that, BAI (CI 95% β: [1.35; 1.90], p < .0001) and BAIADJ (CI 95% β: [1.40; 1.90], p < .0001) have the potential to estimate %F. BAI pointed out a difference in relation to DXA (p = .04). While there was no difference between BAIADJ and DXA (p = .1). There was a proportion bias of 13.2% for BAI (p < .05), but not for BAIADJ (p > .05). Conclusion The adjusted model of the body adiposity index proves to be an effective tool for the analysis of the fat percentage in young males. In addition, it demonstrated significant degrees of agreement and validity in relation to DXA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajhb.23599

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DXA is one of the standard reference methods and non-invasive measurements for FFM and FM in children and adolescents.

    “Several techniques have been used to assess the body composition of children and adolescents, and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is one of the standard reference methods and non-invasive measurements for FFM and FM (8–10).”

    From Development and Cross-Validation of a Predictive Equation for Fat-Free Mass in Brazilian Adolescents by Bioelectrical Impedance (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Body composition section (page unavailable) calls DXA a gold-standard parameter for body-composition analysis and describes its use with pediatric participants. The paper uses DXA to assess body-fat percentage, but the passages do not specifically address fat-free mass (FFM) or describe DXA as non-invasive. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Ci, B., & Rule, R. O. (1987).Confidence intervals.Lancet, 1(8531), 494-7.
  2. Espirito-Santo, H., & Daniel, F. (2015). Calculating and reporting effect sizes on scientific papers (1): p< 0.05 limitations in the analysis of mean differences of two groups. Revista Portuguesa de InvestigacaoComportamental e Social, 1(1), 3-16.
  3. Miot, H. A. (2016). Agreement analysis in clinical and experimental trials. Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, 15(2), 89-92.
  4. Neto, G. D. A. M., de Oliveira Luz, L. G., do Carmo, B. C. M., Mello Pedreiro, R. C., Costa, S. S., & da Cunha Junior, A. T. (2015). Abdominal perimeter: evidence for the prediction of subcutaneous body fat in schoolchildren. ConScientiae Saúde, 14 (4), 600- 607. [Translated from Portuguese -Brazil].
  5. Perini, T. A., de Oliveira, G. L., Ornellas, J. S., & de Oliveira, F. P. (2005). Technical error of measurement in anthropometry. Rev Bras Med Esporte, 11(1), 81-85.
  6. Sant'Anna, M. D. S. L., Priore, S. E., &Franceschini, S. D. C. C. (2009). Body composition assessment methods in children. Revista Paulista de Pediatria, 27 (3), 315- 321. [TranslatedfromPortuguese -Brazil].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macêdo Cesário, T., Almeida‐Neto, P. F., Matos, D. G., Wells, J., Aidar, F. J., Costa, R. F., & Araújo Tinoco Cabral, B. G.
Affiliations
  • Health Sciences Center, Department of Physical Education Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, UFRN Natal RN Brazil
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Sergipe (BR)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
American Journal of Human Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-24
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
e23599-e23599
ISSN
  • 1042-0533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6300
OpenAlex
W3138327942
Cited by
9
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Human Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Human Health and Disease
Keywords
body adiposity index, body fat percentage, children and adolescents, young men, hip circumference, anthropometric estimation, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, model modification, physical activity
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Anthropometry, Child, Humans, Male, Obesity, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review