Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socioeconomic status, particulate air pollution, and daily mortality: Differential exposure or differential susceptibility

Forastiere, Francesco, Stafoggia, Massimo, Tasco, Carola, Picciotto, Sally, Agabiti, Nerina, Cesaroni, Giulia, Perucci, Carlo A.·2007·American Journal of Industrial Medicine

Abstract

Background: Short‐term increases in particulate air pollution are linked with increased daily mortality and morbidity. Socioeconomic status (SES) is a determinant of overall health. We investigated whether social class is an effect modifier of the PM 10 (particulate matter with diameter <10 micron)‐daily mortality association, and possible mechanisms for this effect modification. Methods: Area‐based traffic emissions, income, and SES were available for each resident in Rome. All natural deaths (83,253 subjects) occurring in Rome among city residents (aged 35+ years) during the period 1998–2001 were identified. For each deceased individual, all the previous hospitalizations within 2 years before death were available via a record linkage procedure. PM 10 daily data were available from two urban monitoring sites. A case‐crossover analysis was utilized in which control days were selected according to the time stratified approach (same day of the week during the same month). Conditional logistic regression was used. Results: Due to the social class distribution in the city, exposure to traffic emissions was higher among those with higher area‐based income and SES. Meanwhile, people of lower social class had suffered to a larger extent from chronic diseases before death than more affluent residents, especially diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Overall, PM 10 (lag 0–1) was strongly associated with mortality (1.1% increase, 95%CI = 0.7–1.6%, per 10 µg/m 3 ). The effect was more pronounced among persons with lower income and SES (1.9% and 1.4% per 10 µg/m 3 , respectively) compared to those in the upper income and SES levels (0.0% and 0.1%, respectively). Conclusions: The results confirm previous suggestions of a stronger effect of particulate air pollution among people in low social class. Given the uneven geographical distributions of social deprivation and traffic emissions in Rome, the most likely explanation is a differential burden of chronic health conditions conferring a greater susceptibility to less advantaged people. Am. J. Ind. Med. 50: 208–216, 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajim.20368

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Forastiere, F., Stafoggia, M., Tasco, C., Picciotto, S., Agabiti, N., Cesaroni, G., & Perucci, C. A.
Venue
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-17
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
208-216
ISSN
  • 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0274
OpenAlex
W1965384302
Cited by
267
References
47
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socioeconomic status, particulate air pollution, and daily mortality: Differential exposure or differential susceptibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajim.20368
The paper
Forastiere, F., Stafoggia, M., Tasco, C., Picciotto, S., Agabiti, N., Cesaroni, G., & Perucci, C. A. (2007). Socioeconomic status, particulate air pollution, and daily mortality: Differential exposure or differential susceptibility. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20368

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.