Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Schizophrenia: A genome scan targets chromosomes 3p and 8p as potential sites of susceptibility genes

Pulver, Ann E., Lasseter, Virginia K., Kasch, Laura, Wolyniec, Paula, Nestadt, Gerald, Blouin, Jean‐Louis, Kimberland, Michelle, Babb, Robert, Vourlis, Sophia, Chen, Haiming, Lalioti, Maria, Morris, Michael A., Karayiorgou, Maria, Ott, Jurg, Meyers, Deborah, Antonarakis, Stylianos E., Housman, David, Kazazian, Haig H.·1995·American Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

Using a systematically ascertained sample of 57 families, each having 2 or more members with a consensus diagnosis of schizophrenia (DSM‐III‐R criteria), we have carried out linkage studies of 520 loci, covering approximately 70% of the genome for susceptibility loci for schizophrenia. A two‐stage strategy based on lod score thresholds from simulation studies of our sample identified regions for further exploration. In each region, a dense map of highly informative dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms (heterozygosity greater than .70) was analyzed using dominant, recessive, and “affected only” models and nonparametric sib pair identity‐by‐descent methods. For one region, 8p22‐p21, affected sib‐pair analyses gave a P value = .0001, corresponding to a lod score approximately equal to 3.00. For 8p22–p21, the maximum two‐point lod score occurred using the “affected only” recessive model (Z MAX = 2.35; θ M = θ F); allowing for a constant sex difference in recombination fractions found in reference pedigrees, Z MAX = 2.78 (θ M/θ F = 3). For a second region, 3p26–p24, the maximum two‐point lod score was 2.34 (“affected only” dominant model), and the affected sib‐pair P value was .01. These two regions are worthy of further exploration as potential sites of susceptibility genes for schizophrenia. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.1320600316

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Pulver, A. E., Lasseter, V. K., Kasch, L., Wolyniec, P., Nestadt, G., Blouin, J., Kimberland, M., Babb, R., Vourlis, S., Chen, H., Lalioti, M., Morris, M. A., Karayiorgou, M., Ott, J., Meyers, D., Antonarakis, S. E., Housman, D., & Kazazian, H. H.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-06-19
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
252-260
ISSN
  • 0148-7299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8628
OpenAlex
W2129336823
Cited by
255
References
44
FWCI
15.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Schizophrenia: A genome scan targets chromosomes 3p and 8p as potential sites of susceptibility genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajmg.1320600316
The paper
Pulver, A. E., Lasseter, V. K., Kasch, L., Wolyniec, P., Nestadt, G., Blouin, J., Kimberland, M., Babb, R., Vourlis, S., Chen, H., Lalioti, M., Morris, M. A., Karayiorgou, M., Ott, J., Meyers, D., Antonarakis, S. E., Housman, D., & Kazazian, H. H. (1995). Schizophrenia: A genome scan targets chromosomes 3p and 8p as potential sites of susceptibility genes. American Journal of Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320600316

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.