Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CAG‐repeat length and the age of onset in Huntington disease (HD): A review and validation study of statistical approaches

Langbehn, Douglas R., Hayden, Michael R., Paulsen, Jane S., and the PREDICT‐HD Investigators of the Huntington Study Group·2010·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics

Abstract

CAG‐repeat length in the gene for HD is inversely correlated with age of onset (AOO). A number of statistical models elucidating the relationship between CAG length and AOO have recently been published. In the present article, we review the published formulae, summarize essential differences in participant sources, statistical methodologies, and predictive results. We argue that unrepresentative sampling and failure to use appropriate survival analysis methodology may have substantially biased much of the literature. We also explain why the survival analysis perspective is necessary if any such model is to undergo prospective validation. We use prospective diagnostic data from the PREDICT‐HD longitudinal study of CAG‐expanded participants to test conditional predictions derived from two survival models of AOO of HD. A prior model of the relationship of CAG and AOO originally published by Langbehn et al. yields reasonably accurate predictions, while a similar model by Gutierrez and MacDonald substantially overestimates diagnosis risk for all but the highest risk participants in this sample. The Langbehn et al. model appears accurate enough to have substantial utility in various research contexts. We also emphasize remaining caveats, many of which are relevant for any direct application to genetic counseling. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.b.30992

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Akaike H, 1973, Second International Symposium on Information theory, 267
  2. 10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_38 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Allison PD, 1995, Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide, 292
  4. 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.600305.x · DOI
  5. 10.1136/jmg.2006.045153 · DOI
  6. Andresen JM, 2007, The relationship between CAG repeat length and age of onset differs for Huntington's disease patients with juvenile onset or adult onset, Ann Hum Genet, 71, 293, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00335.x · DOI
  7. 10.1038/ng0893-398 · DOI
  8. 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550120105023 · DOI
  9. Brinkman RR, 1997, The likelihood of being affected with Huntington disease by a particular age, for a specific CAG size, Am J Hum Genet, 60, 1202
  10. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.03.004 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00436-1 · DOI
  12. Clark V, 2004, SAS/STAT 9.1: User's guide
  13. Cox DR, 1984, Analysis of survival data, 201
  14. 10.1002/ajmg.a.20190 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1086/318193 · DOI
  16. Gutierrez C, 2002, Huntington's disease and insurance. I: A model of Huntington's disease
  17. 10.1080/03461230310016992 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/mds.870110204 · DOI
  20. Insightful Corporation, 2007, S‐Plus 8 guide to statistics
  21. 10.1002/9781118032985 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Knight K, 2000, Mathematical statistics, 481
  23. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00241.x · DOI
  24. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000261918.90053.96 · DOI
  25. Lawless JF, 2003, Statistical models and methods for lifetime data, 630
  26. 10.1086/378133 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/BF00209410 · DOI
  28. 10.1097/00005792-200207000-00001 · DOI
  29. 10.1212/WNL.53.6.1330 · DOI
  30. Maller RA, 1996, Survival analysis with long‐term survivors, 278
  31. Marshall AW, 2007, Life distributions: Structure of nonparametric, semiparametric, and parametric families, 782
  32. 10.1093/hmg/ddn003 · DOI
  33. Neter J, 1990, Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs, 1181
  34. 10.1001/archneur.63.6.883 · DOI
  35. 10.1136/jnnp.2007.128728 · DOI
  36. Ranen NG, 1995, Anticipation and instability of IT‐15 (CAG)n repeats in parent‐offspring pairs with Huntington disease, Am J Hum Genet, 57, 593
  37. 10.1093/hmg/ddm301 · DOI
  38. Rubinsztein DC, 1996, Phenotypic characterization of individuals with 30‐40 CAG repeats in the Huntington disease (HD) gene reveals HD cases with 36 repeats and apparently normal elderly individuals with 36‐39 repeats, Am J Hum Genet, 59, 16
  39. 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3872 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/978-1-4899-4491-7 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/ng0893-393 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/1096-8628(20001211)95:4<366::AID-AJMG13>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/hmg/2.10.1547 · DOI
  44. 10.1136/jmg.31.5.377 · DOI
  45. Venables WN, 2002, Modern applied statistics with S, 495, 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 · DOI
  46. 10.1136/jnnp.64.6.758 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.02.003 · DOI
  48. 10.1006/mcpr.1993.1034 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Langbehn, D. R., Hayden, M. R., Paulsen, J. S., & and the PREDICT‐HD Investigators of the Huntington Study Group
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-18
Volume
153B
Issue
2
Pages
397-408
ISSN
  • 1552-4841
  • 1552-485X
Cited by
338
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review